paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

What Does a Discrete Diffusion Model Learn?

2026-07-06 · Rodrigo Casado Noguerales, Bernhard Schölkopf, Thomas Hofmann, Aran Raoufi arxiv

What does a discrete diffusion model learn: a denoiser, a score ratio, or a bridge plug-in predictor? At the level of jump rates, these are one object in different coordinates, and reading a neural network in the wrong coordinate changes the process being trained and sampled. Starting with a rigorous derivation of the continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) ELBO for any noising process, boundary terms included, we prove the \emph{Oracle Distance} theorem: the negative ELBO is exactly equal to the data entropy plus the path KL from the oracle reverse process to the learned one, not merely a bound. Its unique optimizer is therefore the conditional expectation of the true reverse jump rate given the current noisy state, and its irreducible cost is the rate at which the forward process $Z_t$ destroys information about the clean data $Z_0$, $-\tfrac{d}{dt}I(Z_0; Z_t)$, so every noising process shares the same best achievable negative ELBO: the data entropy. For sequences with token-factorizing noise, the oracle projection yields three exact coordinates for the optimizer: denoiser, cavity (bridge plug-in), and score, with closed-form conversions among them. This framework identifies which law each loss in the literature actually optimizes, recovering MDM, UDM, SEDD, and GIDD as special cases; explains why denoiser and cavity coincide for masked diffusion but not for uniform diffusion; proves that a denoiser parameterization makes the uniform ELBO diverge at initialization while the bridge plug-in stays finite; and calibrates ELBO implementations exactly at initialization. Every identity is verified numerically, without approximation, on an exactly solvable model.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.05381

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Why Masking Diffusion Works: Condition on the Jump Schedule for Improved Discrete Diffusion

2025-06-10 · Alan N. Amin, Nate Gruver, Andrew Gordon Wilson

Discrete diffusion models, like continuous diffusion models, generate high-quality samples by gradually undoing noise applied to datapoints with a Markov process. Gradual generation in theory comes with many conceptual b…

Discrete Predictor-Corrector Diffusion Models for Image Synthesis

2022-09-29 · ICLR Anonymous Submission 2022 9 · Anonymous

We introduce Discrete Predictor-Corrector diffusion models (DPC), extending predictor-corrector samplers in Gaussian diffusion models to the discrete case. Predictor-corrector samplers are a class of samplers for diffusi…

Conditional Image GenerationImage Generation

What Exactly Does Guidance Do in Masked Discrete Diffusion Models

2025-06-12 · He Ye, Rojas Kevin, Tao Molei

We study masked discrete diffusion models with classifier-free guidance (CFG). Assuming no score error nor discretization error, we derive an explicit solution to the guided reverse dynamics, so that how guidance influen…

Discrete Copula Diffusion

2024-10-02 · Anji Liu, Oliver Broadrick, Mathias Niepert, Guy Van Den Broeck

Discrete diffusion models have recently shown significant progress in modeling complex data, such as natural languages and DNA sequences. However, unlike diffusion models for continuous data, which can generate high-qual…

Conditional Text GenerationDenoisingText Generation

DisCo-Diff: Enhancing Continuous Diffusion Models with Discrete Latents

2024-07-03 · Yilun Xu, Gabriele Corso, Tommi Jaakkola, Arash Vahdat 외

Diffusion models (DMs) have revolutionized generative learning. They utilize a diffusion process to encode data into a simple Gaussian distribution. However, encoding a complex, potentially multimodal data distribution i…

Image GenerationMolecular Docking