paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

What Human-Horse Interactions may Teach us About Effective Human-AI Interactions

2024-12-18 · Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Stanley Ahalt

This article explores human-horse interactions as a metaphor for understanding and designing effective human-AI partnerships. Drawing on the long history of human collaboration with horses, we propose that AI, like horses, should complement rather than replace human capabilities. We move beyond traditional benchmarks such as the Turing test, which emphasize AI's ability to mimic human intelligence, and instead advocate for a symbiotic relationship where distinct intelligences enhance each other. We analyze key elements of human-horse relationships: trust, communication, and mutual adaptability, to highlight essential principles for human-AI collaboration. Trust is critical in both partnerships, built through predictability and shared understanding, while communication and feedback loops foster mutual adaptability. We further discuss the importance of taming and habituation in shaping these interactions, likening it to how humans train AI to perform reliably and ethically in real-world settings. The article also addresses the asymmetry of responsibility, where humans ultimately bear the greater burden of oversight and ethical judgment. Finally, we emphasize that long-term commitment and continuous learning are vital in both human-horse and human-AI relationships, as ongoing interaction refines the partnership and increases mutual adaptability. By drawing on these insights from human-horse interactions, we offer a vision for designing AI systems that are trustworthy, adaptable, and capable of fostering symbiotic human-AI partnerships.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2412.13405

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

What AI can do for horse-racing ?

2022-07-11 · Pierre Colle

Since the 1980s, machine learning has been widely used for horse-racing predictions, gradually expanding to where algorithms are now playing a huge role in the betting market. Machine learning has changed the horse-racin…

BIG-bench Machine Learning

What Do You Think I Think? Accounting for Human Beliefs Using Second-Order Theory of Mind

2026-05-12 · Patrick Callaghan, Reid Simmons, Henny Admoni arxiv

Discrepancies between an agent's actual knowledge and what a person thinks the agent knows can hinder interactions. If an agent could detect such discrepancies, it could provide feedback to account for them and improve c…

Comparison of Lexical Alignment with a Teachable Robot in Human-Robot and Human-Human-Robot Interactions

2022-09-23 · SIGDIAL (ACL) 2022 9 · Yuya Asano, Diane Litman, Mingzhi Yu, Nikki Lobczowski 외

Speakers build rapport in the process of aligning conversational behaviors with each other. Rapport engendered with a teachable agent while instructing domain material has been shown to promote learning. Past work on lex…

NeoHorse-1: Towards Recursive Self-Improvement via Agentic Post-Training with Routing Harness

2026-09-08 · NeoHorse Team, Guoliang Cao, Guohao Dai, Tianyu Guo 외 hf

Recursive self-improvement (RSI) requires a concrete mechanism through which an AI system observes its capabilities and converts that evidence into the next round of learning. We present NeoHorse-1, a family of agent-nat…

Instruction Following

Using Machine Teaching to Investigate Human Assumptions when Teaching Reinforcement Learners

2020-09-05 · Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Xuezhou Zhang, Yuzhe ma, Mark K. Ho 외

Successful teaching requires an assumption of how the learner learns - how the learner uses experiences from the world to update their internal states. We investigate what expectations people have about a learner when th…

Q-Learning