paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

What Is The Performance Ceiling of My Classifier? Utilizing Category-Wise Influence Functions for Pareto Frontier Analysis

2025-10-04 · Shahriar Kabir Nahin, Wenxiao Xiao, Joshua Liu, Anshuman Chhabra, Hongfu Liu arxiv

Data-centric learning seeks to improve model performance from the perspective of data quality, and has been drawing increasing attention in the machine learning community. Among its key tools, influence functions provide a powerful framework to quantify the impact of individual training samples on model predictions, enabling practitioners to identify detrimental samples and retrain models on a cleaner dataset for improved performance. However, most existing work focuses on the question: "what data benefits the learning model?" In this paper, we take a step further and investigate a more fundamental question: "what is the performance ceiling of the learning model?" Unlike prior studies that primarily measure improvement through overall accuracy, we emphasize category-wise accuracy and aim for Pareto improvements, ensuring that every class benefits, rather than allowing tradeoffs where some classes improve at the expense of others. To address this challenge, we propose category-wise influence functions and introduce an influence vector that quantifies the impact of each training sample across all categories. Leveraging these influence vectors, we develop a principled criterion to determine whether a model can still be improved, and further design a linear programming-based sample reweighting framework to achieve Pareto performance improvements. Through extensive experiments on synthetic datasets, vision, and text benchmarks, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in estimating and achieving a model's performance improvement across multiple categories of interest.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.03950

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Has Automated Essay Scoring Reached Sufficient Accuracy? Deriving Achievable QWK Ceilings from Classical Test Theory

2026-04-21 · Masaki Uto arxiv

Automated essay scoring (AES) is commonly evaluated on public benchmarks using quadratic weighted kappa (QWK). However, because benchmark labels are assigned by human raters and inevitably contain scoring errors, it rema…

Automated Essay Scoring

Adversarial Category Alignment Network for Cross-domain Sentiment Classification

2019-06-01 · NAACL 2019 6 · Xiaoye Qu, Zhikang Zou, Yu Cheng, Yang Yang 외

Cross-domain sentiment classification aims to predict sentiment polarity on a target domain utilizing a classifier learned from a source domain. Most existing adversarial learning methods focus on aligning the global mar…

ClassificationGeneral ClassificationSentiment AnalysisSentiment Classification

Vicinal and categorical domain adaptation

2021-03-05 · Hui Tang, Kui Jia

Unsupervised domain adaptation aims to learn a task classifier that performs well on the unlabeled target domain, by utilizing the labeled source domain. Inspiring results have been acquired by learning domain-invariant …

Domain AdaptationUnsupervised Domain Adaptation

Computing with Stochastic Oracles in AI-Augmented Computation

2026-07-08 · Jie Wang arxiv

The Stochastic-Oracle Turing Machine (SOTM) framework models AI-augmented computation as the interaction of a probabilistic Turing machine with an oracle whose responses are drawn from context-dependent distributions. Th…

Are You Still the Agent I Authorized? Earned Authority under a Fixed Ceiling for Evolving Agents

2026-07-26 · Zhaoxi Zhang, Xiaomei Zhang arxiv

Long-lived AI agents increasingly evolve after deployment by retaining experience, acquiring skills and tools, revising workflows, delegating work, and moving across task phases. This improves adaptation but creates a di…