What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?
Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate politically biased text. Yet, it remains unclear how such biases arise, making it difficult to design effective mitigation strategies. We hypothesize that these biases are rooted in the composition of training data. Taking a data-centric perspective, we formulate research questions on (1) political leaning present in data, (2) data imbalance, (3) cross-dataset similarity, and (4) data-model alignment. We then examine how exposure to political content relates to models' stances on policy issues. We analyze the political content of pre- and post-training datasets of open-source LLMs, combining large-scale sampling, political-leaning classification, and stance detection. We find that training data is systematically skewed toward left-leaning content, with pre-training corpora containing substantially more politically engaged material than post-training data. We further observe a strong correlation between political stances in training data and model behavior, and show that pre-training datasets exhibit similar political distributions despite different curation strategies. In addition, we find that political biases are already present in base models and persist across post-training stages. These findings highlight the central role of data composition in shaping model behavior and motivate the need for greater data transparency.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Stance DetectionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Measuring Political Bias in Large Language Models: What Is Said and How It Is Said
We propose to measure political bias in LLMs by analyzing both the content and style of their generated content regarding political issues. Existing benchmarks and measures focus on gender and racial biases. However, pol…
Large-Scale Analysis of Persuasive Content on Moltbook
We present an NLP-based study of political propaganda on Moltbook, a Reddit-style platform for AI agents. To enable large-scale analysis, we develop LLM-based classifiers to detect political propaganda, validated against…
Two Computational Models for Analyzing Political Attention in Social Media
Understanding how political attention is divided and over what subjects is crucial for research on areas such as agenda setting, framing, and political rhetoric. Existing methods for measuring attention, such as manual l…
Vocal Bursts Valence PredictionExploiting contextual information to improve stance detection in informal political discourse with LLMs
This study investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for political stance detection in informal online discourse, where language is often sarcastic, ambiguous, and context-dependent. We explore whether providi…
Stance DetectionMapping Election Toxicity on Social Media across Issue, Ideology, and Psychosocial Dimensions
Online political hostility is pervasive, yet it remains unclear how toxicity varies across campaign issues and political ideology, and what psychosocial signals and framing accompany toxic expression online. In this work…