paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"

2024-10-31 · Mark Díaz, Angela DR Smith

Human experts are often engaged in the development of machine learning systems to collect and validate data, consult on algorithm development, and evaluate system performance. At the same time, who counts as an 'expert' and what constitutes 'expertise' is not always explicitly defined. In this work, we review 112 academic publications that explicitly reference 'expert' and 'expertise' and that describe the development of machine learning (ML) systems to survey how expertise is characterized and the role experts play. We find that expertise is often undefined and forms of knowledge outside of formal education and professional certification are rarely sought, which has implications for the kinds of knowledge that are recognized and legitimized in ML development. Moreover, we find that expert knowledge tends to be utilized in ways focused on mining textbook knowledge, such as through data annotation. We discuss the ways experts are engaged in ML development in relation to deskilling, the social construction of expertise, and implications for responsible AI development. We point to a need for reflection and specificity in justifications of domain expert engagement, both as a matter of documentation and reproducibility, as well as a matter of broadening the range of recognized expertise.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2411.00179

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Specificity

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing

2024-06-24 · Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, Zhongfen Deng 외

This work is motivated by two key trends. On one hand, large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable versatility in various generative tasks such as writing, drawing, and question answering, significantly reducing t…

Question Answering

On the limits and opportunities of AI reviewers: Reviewing the reviews of Nature-family papers with 45 expert scientists

2026-05-20 · Seungone Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Kiril Gashteovski, Juyoung Suk 외 arxiv

With the advancement of AI capabilities, AI reviewers are beginning to be deployed in scientific peer review, yet their capability and credibility remain in question: many scientists simply view them as probabilistic sys…

Human-Centric Research for NLP: Towards a Definition and Guiding Questions

2022-07-10 · Bhushan Kotnis, Kiril Gashteovski, Julia Gastinger, Giuseppe Serra 외

With Human-Centric Research (HCR) we can steer research activities so that the research outcome is beneficial for human stakeholders, such as end users. But what exactly makes research human-centric? We address this ques…

What makes a good concept anyway ?

2024-09-10 · Naren Khatwani, James Geller

A good medical ontology is expected to cover its domain completely and correctly. On the other hand, large ontologies are hard to build, hard to understand, and hard to maintain. Thus, adding new concepts (often multi-wo…

Bayesian Optimization

What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?

2024-05-10 · Ilia Kuznetsov, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Koen Dercksen, Nils Dycke 외

The number of scientific articles produced every year is growing rapidly. Providing quality control over them is crucial for scientists and, ultimately, for the public good. In modern science, this process is largely del…

Articles