paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

When Are Experts Misrouted? Counterfactual Routing Analysis in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models

2026-05-08 · Youngsik Yoon, Siwei Wang, Wei Chen, Jungseul Ok arxiv

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models route each token to a small subset of experts, but whether the routes selected by a trained top-$k$ router are good ones is rarely evaluated directly. Holding the model fixed, we compare each standard route against sampled equal-compute alternatives for the same token and score each by the next-token probability it assigns to the realized token in a verified reasoning trajectory. The result is sharply token-conditional: the standard router is well-aligned with route utility on confident tokens but uninformative on the fragile tokens that drive hard reasoning, where lower-loss equal-compute routes consistently exist inside the frozen model but are not selected. The same pattern holds across Qwen3-30B-A3B, GPT-OSS-20B, DeepSeek-V2-Lite, and OLMoE-1B-7B, and follows structurally from how standard top-$k$ training evaluates routing decisions: the language modeling loss scores only the executed route, and load balancing depends only on aggregate routing statistics. A minimal router-only update to the final-layer router, leaving every expert and every other router frozen, is sufficient to shift pass@K on AIME 2024+2025 and HMMT 2025 for both Qwen3-30B-A3B and GPT-OSS-20B, suggesting that at least part of the failure reflects router-reachable misallocation rather than expert capacity alone.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.07260

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Awakening Dormant Experts:Counterfactual Routing to Mitigate MoE Hallucinations

2026-04-15 · Wentao Hu, Yanbo Zhai, Xiaohui Hu, Mingkuan Zhao 외 arxiv

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have achieved remarkable scalability, yet they remain vulnerable to hallucinations, particularly when processing long-tail knowledge. We identify that this fragility stems from stat…

When the Model Said 'No Comment', We Knew Helpfulness Was Dead, Honesty Was Alive, and Safety Was Terrified

2026-02-07 · Gautam Siddharth Kashyap, Mark Dras, Usman Naseem arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) need to be in accordance with human values-being helpful, harmless, and honest (HHH)-is important for safe deployment. Existing works use Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Mixture-of-Experts (…

Beyond Spurious Signals: Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models via Counterfactual Inference and Adaptive Expert Routing

2025-09-18 · Zichen Wu, Hsiu-Yuan Huang, Yunfang Wu arxiv

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown substantial capabilities in integrating visual and textual information, yet frequently rely on spurious correlations, undermining their robustness and generalization in…

Multimodal ReasoningSentiment AnalysisSarcasm Detection

Seeing but Not Thinking: Routing Distraction in Multimodal Mixture-of-Experts

2026-04-09 · Haolei Xu, Haiwen Hong, Hongxing Li, Rui Zhou 외 arxiv

Multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have achieved remarkable performance on vision-language tasks. However, we identify a puzzling phenomenon termed Seeing but Not Thinking: models accurately perceive image conten…

Visual Reasoning

Mixture of experts architectures for machine learning interatomic potentials

2026-03-09 · Yuzhi Liu, Duo Zhang, Anyang Peng, Weinan E 외 arxiv

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) enable accurate large-scale atomistic simulations, yet improving their expressive capacity efficiently remains challenging. Here we systematically investigate Mixture-of-Ex…