paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

When Benign Inputs Lead to Severe Harms: Eliciting Unsafe Unintended Behaviors of Computer-Use Agents

2026-02-09 · Jaylen Jones, Zhehao Zhang, Yuting Ning, Eric Fosler-Lussier, Pierre-Luc St-Charles, Yoshua Bengio, Dawn Song, Yu Su, Huan Sun arxiv

Although computer-use agents (CUAs) hold significant potential to automate increasingly complex OS workflows, they can demonstrate unsafe unintended behaviors that deviate from expected outcomes even under benign input contexts. However, exploration of this risk remains largely anecdotal, lacking concrete characterization and automated methods to proactively surface long-tail unintended behaviors under realistic CUA scenarios. To fill this gap, we introduce the first conceptual and methodological framework for unintended CUA behaviors, by defining their key characteristics, automatically eliciting them, and analyzing how they arise from benign inputs. We propose AutoElicit: an agentic framework that iteratively perturbs benign instructions using CUA execution feedback, and elicits severe harms while keeping perturbations realistic and benign. Using AutoElicit, we surface hundreds of harmful unintended behaviors from state-of-the-art CUAs such as Claude 4.5 Haiku, Claude 4.5 Opus, and Operator. We further evaluate the transferability of human-verified successful perturbations, identifying persistent susceptibility to unintended behaviors across various other frontier CUAs. This work establishes a foundation for systematically analyzing unintended behaviors in realistic computer-use settings.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2602.08235

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use Agents

2026-04-12 · Xuwei Ding, Skylar Zhai, Linxin Song, Jiate Li 외 arxiv

Computer-use agents (CUAs) can now autonomously complete complex tasks in real digital environments, but when misled, they can also be used to automate harmful actions programmatically. Existing safety evaluations largel…

Rethinking Hallucinations: Correctness, Consistency, and Prompt Multiplicity

2026-01-31 · Prakhar Ganesh, Reza Shokri, Golnoosh Farnadi arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are known to "hallucinate" by generating false or misleading outputs. Hallucinations pose various harms, from erosion of trust to widespread misinformation. Existing hallucination evaluation,…

Benign Samples Matter! Fine-tuning On Outlier Benign Samples Severely Breaks Safety

2025-05-11 · Zihan Guan, Mengxuan Hu, Ronghang Zhu, Sheng Li 외

Recent studies have uncovered a troubling vulnerability in the fine-tuning stage of large language models (LLMs): even fine-tuning on entirely benign datasets can lead to a significant increase in the harmfulness of LLM …

Outlier DetectionRed TeamingSafety Alignment

EnCAgg: Enhanced Clustering Aggregation for Robust Federated Learning against Dynamic Model Poisoning

2026-05-21 · Tianyun Zhang, Zhen Yang, Haozhao Wang, Ru Zhang 외 arxiv

Federated learning faces increasing threats from model poisoning attacks, which harms its application to improve privacy. Existing defense methods typically rely on fixed thresholds or perform clustering with a fixed num…

Federated Learning

Sugar-Coated Poison: Benign Generation Unlocks LLM Jailbreaking

2025-04-08 · Yu-Hang Wu, Yu-jie Xiong, Hao Zhang, Jia-Chen Zhang 외

With the increasingly deep integration of large language models (LLMs) across diverse domains, the effectiveness of their safety mechanisms is encountering severe challenges. Currently, jailbreak attacks based on prompt …

Prompt Engineering