When Do Conservation Laws Survive Learned Representations? Certified Horizons for Latent World Models
We ask a representation-learning question about physical world models: when does a conservation law remain certifiable after a model learns a latent representation? A certified horizon bounds -- in advance, from measurable model defects -- how many steps a rollout provably stays on a physical invariant's level set. The key design choice is what is certified: not a learned latent Hamiltonian or a learned scalar witness (a model can conserve either while drifting in true energy), but the decoded physical invariant obtained by decoding the latent state and evaluating the known invariant. Around this object we derive shell-horizon certificates whose budget decomposes into representation, readout, and latent-dynamics defects, with a monotone alignment bridge through which a soft learned witness yields a certified horizon for the decoded invariant, and test them across state, learned-lift, and pixel observations on conservative systems. Conservation certificates can survive learned representation, but not all geometric priors survive equally. Hard canonical symplectic structure yields the longest horizons in known phase coordinates yet does not cross a learned chart, whereas a controlled-Lipschitz-aligned soft invariant survives in the nonlinear learned-representation settings we test -- two lift systems, with the gain growing with nonlinearity, and pixels. Pixel certification is recovered on a readout-stable sub-tube, and the Kepler problem exposes a geometric boundary. The central object is therefore not a latent Hamiltonian, but a decoded physical invariant whose robustness to representation learning can be measured, certified, and falsified.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Representation LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Keep the Momentum: Conservation Laws beyond Euclidean Gradient Flows
Conservation laws are well-established in the context of Euclidean gradient flow dynamics, notably for linear or ReLU neural network training. Yet, their existence and principles for non-Euclidean geometries and momentum…
Learning to Discretize: Solving 1D Scalar Conservation Laws via Deep Reinforcement Learning
Conservation laws are considered to be fundamental laws of nature. It has broad applications in many fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, geology, and engineering. Solving the differential equations associated …
Decision MakingDeep Reinforcement LearningMeta-Learningreinforcement-learning+3SPIKE: Stable Physics-Informed Kernel Evolution Method for Solving Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
We introduce the Stable Physics-Informed Kernel Evolution (SPIKE) method for numerical computation of inviscid hyperbolic conservation laws. SPIKE resolves a fundamental paradox: how strong-form residual minimization can…
A data-driven learned discretization approach in finite volume schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and varying boundary conditions
This paper presents a data-driven finite volume method for solving 1D and 2D hyperbolic partial differential equations. This work builds upon the prior research incorporating a data-driven finite-difference approximation…
Neural Entropy-stable conservative flux form neural networks for learning hyperbolic conservation laws
We propose a neural entropy-stable conservative flux form neural network (NESCFN) for learning hyperbolic conservation laws and their associated entropy functions directly from solution trajectories, without requiring an…