When Should We (Not) Interpret Linear IV Estimands as LATE?
In this paper I revisit the interpretation of the linear instrumental variables (IV) estimand as a weighted average of conditional local average treatment effects (LATEs). I focus on a situation in which additional covariates are required for identification while the reduced-form and first-stage regressions may be misspecified due to an implicit homogeneity restriction on the effects of the instrument. I show that the weights on some conditional LATEs are negative and the IV estimand is no longer interpretable as a causal effect under a weaker version of monotonicity, i.e. when there are compliers but no defiers at some covariate values and defiers but no compliers elsewhere. The problem of negative weights disappears in the interacted specification of Angrist and Imbens (1995), which avoids misspecification and seems to be underused in applied work. I illustrate my findings in an application to the causal effects of pretrial detention on case outcomes. In this setting, I reject the stronger version of monotonicity, demonstrate that the interacted instruments are sufficiently strong for consistent estimation using the jackknife methodology, and present several estimates that are economically and statistically different, depending on whether the interacted instruments are used.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Decomposition and Interpretation of Treatment Effects in Settings with Delayed Outcomes
This paper studies settings where the analyst is interested in identifying and estimating the average causal effect of a binary treatment on an outcome. We consider a setup in which the outcome realization does not get i…
regressionQuantifying the Internal Validity of Weighted Estimands
In this paper we study a class of weighted estimands, which we define as parameters that can be expressed as weighted averages of the underlying heterogeneous treatment effects. The popular ordinary least squares (OLS), …
DiagnosticDynamic Causal Effects in a Nonlinear World: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Applied macroeconomists frequently use impulse response estimators motivated by linear models. We study whether the estimands of such procedures have a causal interpretation when the true data generating process is in fa…
On the Role of the Zero Conditional Mean Assumption for Causal Inference in Linear Models
Many econometrics textbooks imply that under mean independence of the regressors and the error term, the OLS parameters have a causal interpretation. We show that even when this assumption is satisfied, OLS might identif…
Causal InferenceEconometricsregressionImproving the Validity and Practical Usefulness of AI/ML Evaluations Using an Estimands Framework
Commonly, AI or machine learning (ML) models are evaluated on benchmark datasets. This practice supports innovative methodological research, but benchmark performance can be poorly correlated with performance in real-wor…
Benchmarking