paper-with-me

Papers

When to Forget? Complexity Trade-offs in Machine Unlearning

2025-02-24 · Martin Van Waerebeke, Marco Lorenzi, Giovanni Neglia, Kevin Scaman

Machine Unlearning (MU) aims at removing the influence of specific data points from a trained model, striving to achieve this at a fraction of the cost of full model retraining. In this paper, we analyze the efficiency of unlearning methods and establish the first upper and lower bounds on minimax computation times for this problem, characterizing the performance of the most efficient algorithm against the most difficult objective function. Specifically, for strongly convex objective functions and under the assumption that the forget data is inaccessible to the unlearning method, we provide a phase diagram for the unlearning complexity ratio -- a novel metric that compares the computational cost of the best unlearning method to full model retraining. The phase diagram reveals three distinct regimes: one where unlearning at a reduced cost is infeasible, another where unlearning is trivial because adding noise suffices, and a third where unlearning achieves significant computational advantages over retraining. These findings highlight the critical role of factors such as data dimensionality, the number of samples to forget, and privacy constraints in determining the practical feasibility of unlearning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2502.17323

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Machine Unlearning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Utility and Complexity of in- and out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning

2024-12-12 · Youssef Allouah, Joshua Kazdan, Rachid Guerraoui, Sanmi Koyejo

Machine unlearning, the process of selectively removing data from trained models, is increasingly crucial for addressing privacy concerns and knowledge gaps post-deployment. Despite this importance, existing approaches a…

Machine Unlearning

Tradeoffs and Comparison Complexity

2024-01-31 · Cassidy Shubatt, Jeffrey Yang

This paper develops a theory of how tradeoffs govern comparison complexity, and how this complexity generates systematic mistakes in choice. In our model, options are easier to compare when they involve less pronounced t…

Least but not Last: Fine-tuning Intermediate Principal Components for Better Performance-Forgetting Trade-Offs

2026-02-03 · Alessio Quercia, Arya Bangun, Ira Assent, Hanno Scharr arxiv

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) methods have emerged as crucial techniques for adapting large pre-trained models to downstream tasks under computational and memory constraints. However, they face a fundamental challenge in ba…

Continual Learning

SAUL: Sharpness-Aware Augmented-Lagrangian Unlearning

2026-08-17 · Jaewan Choi, Junyoung Yang, Sangdon Park arxiv

Machine unlearning in Large Language Models (LLMs) faces a critical trade-off between erasing target knowledge and preserving general utility. We propose SAUL (Sharpness-Aware Augmented-Lagrangian Unlearning), which form…

T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving

2025-09-26 · Yuanyuan Yang, Ruimin Zhang, Jamie Morgenstern, Haifeng Xu arxiv

As machine learning models continue to grow in size and complexity, efficient serving faces increasingly broad trade-offs spanning accuracy, latency, resource usage, and other objectives. Multi-model serving further comp…