Which argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTM
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Relation ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Length, Interchangeability, and External Knowledge: Observations from Predicting Argument Convincingness
In this work, we provide insight into three key aspects related to predicting argument convincingness. First, we explicitly display the power that text length possesses for predicting convincingness in an unsupervised se…
Semantic CompositionFinding Convincing Arguments Using Scalable Bayesian Preference Learning
We introduce a scalable Bayesian preference learning method for identifying convincing arguments in the absence of gold-standard rat- ings or rankings. In contrast to previous work, we avoid the need for separate methods…
Active LearningVariational InferenceWord EmbeddingsAre You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network
With the advancement in argument detection, we suggest to pay more attention to the challenging task of identifying the more convincing arguments. Machines capable of responding and interacting with humans in helpful way…
Categorical Emotions or Appraisals - Which Emotion Model Explains Argument Convincingness Better?
The convincingness of an argument does not only depend on its structure (logos), the person who makes the argument (ethos), but also on the emotion that it causes in the recipient (pathos). While the overall intensity an…
Ranking Passages for Argument Convincingness
In data ranking applications, pairwise annotation is often more consistent than cardinal annotation for learning ranking models. We examine this in a case study on ranking text passages for argument convincingness. Our t…