paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Which Optimizer Works Best for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks?

2025-01-22 · Elham Kiyani, Khemraj Shukla, Jorge F. Urbán, Jérôme Darbon, George Em Karniadakis

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have revolutionized the computation of PDE solutions by integrating partial differential equations (PDEs) into the neural network's training process as soft constraints, becoming an important component of the scientific machine learning (SciML) ecosystem. More recently, physics-informed Kolmogorv-Arnold networks (PIKANs) have also shown to be effective and comparable in accuracy with PINNs. In their current implementation, both PINNs and PIKANs are mainly optimized using first-order methods like Adam, as well as quasi-Newton methods such as BFGS and its low-memory variant, L-BFGS. However, these optimizers often struggle with highly non-linear and non-convex loss landscapes, leading to challenges such as slow convergence, local minima entrapment, and (non)degenerate saddle points. In this study, we investigate the performance of Self-Scaled BFGS (SSBFGS), Self-Scaled Broyden (SSBroyden) methods and other advanced quasi-Newton schemes, including BFGS and L-BFGS with different line search strategies approaches. These methods dynamically rescale updates based on historical gradient information, thus enhancing training efficiency and accuracy. We systematically compare these optimizers -- using both PINNs and PIKANs -- on key challenging linear, stiff, multi-scale and non-linear PDEs, including the Burgers, Allen-Cahn, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky, and Ginzburg-Landau equations. Our findings provide state-of-the-art results with orders-of-magnitude accuracy improvements without the use of adaptive weights or any other enhancements typically employed in PINNs. More broadly, our results reveal insights into the effectiveness of second-order optimization strategies in significantly improving the convergence and accurate generalization of PINNs and PIKANs.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2501.16371

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Adam 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Improving physics-informed neural networks with meta-learned optimization

2023-03-13 · Alex Bihlo

We show that the error achievable using physics-informed neural networks for solving systems of differential equations can be substantially reduced when these networks are trained using meta-learned optimization methods …

Transfer Learning

PDE-aware Optimizer for Physics-informed Neural Networks

2025-07-10 · Vismay Churiwala, Hardik Shukla, Manurag Khullar arxiv

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physical constraints into the loss function. However, standard optimizers such …

Evolutionary Algorithm-Guided LLMs for Physics-Informed Neural Network Design

2026-07-17 · Xu Yang, Mingyang Yu, Jing Xu, Keqian Li arxiv

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are unusually sensitive to interacting choices of architecture, activation, loss weighting, collocation, optimization, and constraint enforcement. Large language models (LLMs) can…

Enhancing training of physics-informed neural networks using domain-decomposition based preconditioning strategies

2023-06-30 · Alena Kopaničáková, Hardik Kothari, George Em Karniadakis, Rolf Krause

We propose to enhance the training of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). To this aim, we introduce nonlinear additive and multiplicative preconditioning strategies for the widely used L-BFGS optimizer. The nonline…

Curvature-Aware Optimization for High-Accuracy Physics-Informed Neural Networks

2026-04-06 · Anas Jnini, Elham Kiyani, Khemraj Shukla, Jorge F. Urban 외 arxiv

Efficient and robust optimization is essential for neural networks, enabling scientific machine learning models to converge rapidly to very high accuracy -- faithfully capturing complex physical behavior governed by diff…