Women Worry, Men Adopt? Gendered Risk Perceptions and Generative AI Adoption
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is spreading rapidly across work and daily life, yet adoption remains uneven. Men use GenAI more frequently than women, potentially widening inequalities in productivity, skills, and career opportunities. Existing research has largely explained this gap through differences in access, digital skills, and confidence. We argue that these explanations are incomplete: gender differences in GenAI adoption may also reflect how women and men evaluate AI's societal risks. Using two waves (2023-2024) of the nationally representative UK Public Attitudes to Data and AI Tracker (N = 9,172), we combine descriptive analyses with gender-specific, age-stratified random forest models and a parametric score-matching analysis of repeated cross-sections. We first show that men report substantially higher levels of frequent personal GenAI use than women. We then show that this gap is especially pronounced among respondents who express concerns about AI's societal consequences, particularly its effects on mental health and the environment. Intersectional analyses show that the largest disparities arise among younger, digitally fluent individuals with high societal risk concerns, where gender gaps in personal use exceed 45 percentage points. Across predictive models, perceived societal risk has greater predictive relevance for women's adoption than for men's and ranks among the strongest predictors of women's GenAI use. Finally, in score-matched comparisons, higher optimism about AI's societal impact is associated with larger increases in women's uptake, narrowing the gender gap. We interpret these findings as an indication that unresolved AI harms may contribute to unequal access to GenAI's productivity, learning, and career benefits. The findings point to societal risk perception as an important behavioural pathway underlying digital inequality in the AI era.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Angry Men, Sad Women: Large Language Models Reflect Gendered Stereotypes in Emotion Attribution
Large language models (LLMs) reflect societal norms and biases, especially about gender. While societal biases and stereotypes have been extensively researched in various NLP applications, there is a surprising gap for e…
AttributeEmotion RecognitionGenderedNews: Une approche computationnelle des écarts de représentation des genres dans la presse française
In this article, we present {\it GenderedNews} (\url{https://gendered-news.imag.fr}), an online dashboard which gives weekly measures of gender imbalance in French online press. We use Natural Language Processing (NLP) m…
The Uli Dataset: An Exercise in Experience Led Annotation of oGBV
Online gender based violence has grown concomitantly with adoption of the internet and social media. Its effects are worse in the Global majority where many users use social media in languages other than English. The sca…
Gendered Mental Health Stigma in Masked Language Models
Mental health stigma prevents many individuals from receiving the appropriate care, and social psychology studies have shown that mental health tends to be overlooked in men. In this work, we investigate gendered mental …
On Gender Biases in Offensive Language Classification Models
We explore whether neural Natural Language Processing models trained to identify offensive language in tweets contain gender biases. We add historically gendered and gender ambiguous American names to an existing offensi…
Classification