paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

ZPD-SCA: Unveiling the Blind Spots of LLMs in Assessing Students' Cognitive Abilities

2025-08-20 · Wenhan Dong, Zhen Sun, Yuemeng Zhao, Zifan Peng, Jun Wu, Jingyi Zheng, Yule Liu, Xinlei He, Yu Wang, Ruiming Wang, Xinyi Huang, Lei Mo arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in educational applications, yet their capacity to accurately assess the cognitive alignment of reading materials with students' developmental stages remains insufficiently explored. This gap is particularly critical given the foundational educational principle of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), which emphasizes the need to match learning resources with Students' Cognitive Abilities (SCA). Despite the importance of this alignment, there is a notable absence of comprehensive studies investigating LLMs' ability to evaluate reading comprehension difficulty across different student age groups, especially in the context of Chinese language education. To fill this gap, we introduce ZPD-SCA, a novel benchmark specifically designed to assess stage-level Chinese reading comprehension difficulty. The benchmark is annotated by 60 Special Grade teachers, a group that represents the top 0.15% of all in-service teachers nationwide. Experimental results reveal that LLMs perform poorly in zero-shot learning scenarios, with Qwen-max and GLM even falling below the probability of random guessing. When provided with in-context examples, LLMs performance improves substantially, with some models achieving nearly double the accuracy of their zero-shot baselines. These results reveal that LLMs possess emerging abilities to assess reading difficulty, while also exposing limitations in their current training for educationally aligned judgment. Notably, even the best-performing models display systematic directional biases, suggesting difficulties in accurately aligning material difficulty with SCA. Furthermore, significant variations in model performance across different genres underscore the complexity of task. We envision that ZPD-SCA can provide a foundation for evaluating and improving LLMs in cognitively aligned educational applications.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2508.14377

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reading ComprehensionZero-Shot Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Blind-Spots-Bench: Evaluating Blind Spots in Multimodal Models

2026-07-09 · Matteo Santelmo, Xiuying Wei, Israa Fakih, Felix Bauer 외 arxiv

Modern AI models achieve strong performance on many established benchmarks, yet they still fail on tasks that humans find almost trivial, such as manipulating a string or drawing a dog with five legs. These examples sugg…

With Argus Eyes: Assessing Retrieval Gaps via Uncertainty Scoring to Detect and Remedy Retrieval Blind Spots

2026-02-10 · Zeinab Sadat Taghavi, Ali Modarressi, Hinrich Schutze, Andreas Marfurt arxiv

Reliable retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems depend fundamentally on the retriever's ability to find relevant information. We show that neural retrievers used in RAG systems have blind spots, which we define as …

Uncovering Conceptual Blindspots in Generative Image Models Using Sparse Autoencoders

2025-06-24 · Matyas Bohacek, Thomas Fel, Maneesh Agrawala, Ekdeep Singh Lubana

Despite their impressive performance, generative image models trained on large-scale datasets frequently fail to produce images with seemingly simple concepts -- e.g., human hands or objects appearing in groups of four -…

Memorization

Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds

2023-05-24 · Victoria Basmov, Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty

We evaluate LLMs' language understanding capacities on simple inference tasks that most humans find trivial. Specifically, we target (i) grammatically-specified entailments, (ii) premises with evidential adverbs of uncer…

Catching The Correct Answer Trap: Characterising AI Tutor Blind Spots When Analysing Student Reasoning

2026-04-20 · Moiz Imran, Sahan Bulathwela arxiv

Intelligent tutoring systems increasingly provide automated feedback on student work, but robust feedback requires assessing reasoning, not only final answers. We study a failure mode we call the correct answer trap (CAT…