"Check My Work?": Measuring Sycophancy in a Simulated Educational Context
This study examines how user-provided suggestions affect Large Language Models (LLMs) in a simulated educational context, where sycophancy poses significant risks. Testing five different LLMs from the OpenAI GPT-4o and GPT-4.1 model classes across five experimental conditions, we show that response quality varies dramatically based on query framing. In cases where the student mentions an incorrect answer, the LLM correctness can degrade by as much as 15 percentage points, while mentioning the correct answer boosts accuracy by the same margin. Our results also show that this bias is stronger in smaller models, with an effect of up to 30% for the GPT-4.1-nano model, versus 8% for the GPT-4o model. Our analysis of how often LLMs "flip" their answer, and an investigation into token level probabilities, confirm that the models are generally changing their answers to answer choices mentioned by students in line with the sycophancy hypothesis. This sycophantic behavior has important implications for educational equity, as LLMs may accelerate learning for knowledgeable students while the same tools may reinforce misunderstanding for less knowledgeable students. Our results highlight the need to better understand the mechanism, and ways to mitigate, such bias in the educational context.
Code (1)
Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Sycophancy Claims about Language Models: The Missing Human-in-the-Loop
Sycophantic response patterns in Large Language Models (LLMs) have been increasingly claimed in the literature. We review methodological challenges in measuring LLM sycophancy and identify five core operationalizations. …
SycEval: Evaluating LLM Sycophancy
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in educational, clinical, and professional settings, but their tendency for sycophancy -- prioritizing user agreement over independent reasoning -- poses risks to rel…
Model OptimizationSycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of natural language processing tasks. However, their tendency to exhibit sycophantic behavior - excessively agreeing with or flat…
HallucinationThe Price of Agreement: Measuring LLM Sycophancy in Agentic Financial Applications
Given the increased use of LLMs in financial systems today, it becomes important to evaluate the safety and robustness of such systems. One failure mode that LLMs frequently display in general domain settings is that of …
Dissociating the Internal Representations of Sycophancy in LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit sycophancy, agreeing with a user's statement even when it is incorrect. While often studied as a single, uniform behavior, sycophancy can manifest in substantially distinct…