A Causally Grounded Taxonomy for Image Degradation Robustness Evaluation
Image degradations can occur during acquisition, processing, and transmission, altering visual appearance and affecting downstream vision tasks. They are studied in several communities, including synthetic corruption benchmarks for robustness evaluation, perceptual image quality assessment, and physically grounded analyses of imaging systems or real camera failures. Although these areas address closely related phenomena, they often use incompatible grouping schemes and backend specific severity definitions, making results difficult to compare across datasets, degradation sources, and tasks. We propose a causally grounded framework for organizing and interpreting image degradations across these settings. Instead of introducing new degradations or redefining existing benchmarks, we provide an interpretive representation and measurement layer that makes implicit assumptions explicit. Each degradation is described along two orthogonal axes: its dominant causal source in the imaging pipeline (environment, sensor/optics, ISP/renderer/codec, or transfer/system), and its resulting perceptual effect. This dual axis abstraction yields a compact taxonomy spanning algorithmic corruptions, perceptual distortions, and physically motivated imaging artifacts. To address inconsistent severity semantics without changing existing implementations, we introduce a lightweight severity measurement layer. For every degradation and each native severity level of a given backend, we quantify degradation strength using full reference image quality metrics: PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS. This makes severity observable and comparable across sources while preserving native parameterizations. We demonstrate the framework through COCO Degradation, a taxonomy aligned benchmark for evaluating object detector robustness under diverse imaging conditions.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Image Quality AssessmentSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
On Creating a Causally Grounded Usable Rating Method for Assessing the Robustness of Foundation Models Supporting Time Series
Foundation Models (FMs) have improved time series forecasting in various sectors, such as finance, but their vulnerability to input disturbances can hinder their adoption by stakeholders, such as investors and analysts. …
Model SelectionStock Price PredictionTime SeriesTime Series ForecastingBenchmarking Sensor-Fault Robustness in Forecasting
Cyber-physical system (CPS) forecasting models depend on sensor streams with noisy, biased, missing, or temporally misaligned readings, yet standard forecasting evaluation often selects models by nominal error without sh…
Dissecting Chronos: Sparse Autoencoders Reveal Causal Feature Hierarchies in Time Series Foundation Models
Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet their internal representations remain opaque. We present the first application of sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to a TSFM, training…
Decodable Is Not Grounded: A Vision-Ablation Arbiter for VLM Spatial Reasoning
The standard way to read latent knowledge out of a model, a linear probe confirmed by a steering recovery, can systematically overstate what a vision-language model (VLM) actually grounds in the image. We show this on sp…
Spatial ReasoningOn measuring grounding and generalizing grounding problems
The symbol grounding problem asks how tokens like cat can be about cats, as opposed to mere shapes manipulated in a calculus. We recast grounding from a binary judgment into an audit across desiderata, each indexed by an…