A Human-Grounded Evaluation Benchmark for Local Explanations of Machine Learning
Research in interpretable machine learning proposes different computational and human subject approaches to evaluate model saliency explanations. These approaches measure different qualities of explanations to achieve diverse goals in designing interpretable machine learning systems. In this paper, we propose a human attention benchmark for image and text domains using multi-layer human attention masks aggregated from multiple human annotators. We then present an evaluation study to evaluate model saliency explanations obtained using Grad-cam and LIME techniques. We demonstrate our benchmark's utility for quantitative evaluation of model explanations by comparing it with human subjective ratings and ground-truth single-layer segmentation masks evaluations. Our study results show that our threshold agnostic evaluation method with the human attention baseline is more effective than single-layer object segmentation masks to ground truth. Our experiments also reveal user biases in the subjective rating of model saliency explanations.
Code (1)
Tasks
BIG-bench Machine LearningDecision MakingInterpretable Machine LearningSegmentationSemantic SegmentationMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
The Blame Problem in Evaluating Local Explanations, and How to Tackle it
The number of local model-agnostic explanation techniques proposed has grown rapidly recently. One main reason is that the bar for developing new explainability techniques is low due to the lack of optimal evaluation mea…
Locate-Then-Examine: Grounded Region Reasoning Improves Detection of AI-Generated Images
The rapid growth of AI-generated imagery has blurred the boundary between real and synthetic content, raising practical concerns for digital integrity. Vision-language models (VLMs) can provide natural language explanati…
Grounded but Misleading: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in AI-Generated Security Explanations
Online scams increasingly leverage fluent and context-aware social engineering strategies, creating growing demand for AI systems that explain why a message may be risky. However, explanations that cite detector-derived …
XAI-Grounded Explanation Generation for Speech Deepfake Detection with Training-Free Multimodal Large Language Models
Speech deepfake detection (SDD) systems require trustworthy explanations for reliable decision-making. Existing explanation ways mainly fall into two categories. Traditional explainable AI (XAI), such as gradient-based a…
Explanation GenerationDeepFake DetectionSIDU-TXT: An XAI Algorithm for NLP with a Holistic Assessment Approach
Explainable AI (XAI) aids in deciphering 'black-box' models. While several methods have been proposed and evaluated primarily in the image domain, the exploration of explainability in the text domain remains a growing re…
Sentiment Analysis