paper-with-me

Papers

AISysRev -- LLM-based Tool for Title-abstract Screening

2025-10-08 · Aleksi Huotala, Miikka Kuutila, Olli-Pekka Turtio, Simo Sipilä, Mika Mäntylä arxiv

Conducting systematic reviews is laborious. In the screening or study selection phase, the number of papers can be overwhelming. Recent research has demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can perform title-abstract screening and support humans in the task. To this end, we developed AISysRev, an LLM-based screening tool implemented as a containerized web application. The tool accepts CSV files containing paper titles and abstracts. Users specify inclusion and exclusion criteria. Multiple different LLMs can be used, such as Gemini, Claude, Mistral or ChatGPT via OpenRouter. We also support locally hosted models and any model compatible with the OpenAI SDK. AISysRev implements both zero-shot and few-shot prompting, and also allows for manual screening through interfaces that display LLM results as guidance for human reviewers. LLM calls are parallelized, meaning screening speed is typically between 100 to 300 papers per minute, depending on the model and the host. To demonstrate the tool's use in practice, we conducted a qualitative trial study with 137 papers using the tool. Our findings indicate that papers can be classified into four categories: Easy Includes, Easy Excludes, Boundary Includes, and Boundary Excludes. The Boundary cases, where LLMs are prone to errors, highlight the need for human intervention. While LLMs do not replace human judgment in systematic reviews, they can reduce the burden of assessing large volumes of scientific literature. Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeblemlgnAQ Tool: https://github.com/EvoTestOps/AISysRev

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.06708

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Streamlining Systematic Reviews: A Novel Application of Large Language Models

2024-12-14 · Fouad Trad, Ryan Yammine, Jana Charafeddine, Marlene Chakhtoura 외

Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential for evidence-based guidelines but are often limited by the time-consuming nature of literature screening. We propose and evaluate an in-house system based on Large Language Models (…

ArticlesPrompt EngineeringRAGRetrieval-augmented Generation+1

The Promise and Challenges of Using LLMs to Accelerate the Screening Process of Systematic Reviews

2024-04-24 · Aleksi Huotala, Miikka Kuutila, Paul Ralph, Mika Mäntylä

Systematic review (SR) is a popular research method in software engineering (SE). However, conducting an SR takes an average of 67 weeks. Thus, automating any step of the SR process could reduce the effort associated wit…

Text Simplification

Leveraging LLMs for Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Review: A Cost-Effective Dynamic Few-Shot Learning Approach

2025-12-12 · Yun-Chung Liu, Rui Yang, Jonathan Chong Kai Liew, Ziran Yin 외 arxiv

Systematic reviews are a key component of evidence-based medicine, playing a critical role in synthesizing existing research evidence and guiding clinical decisions. However, with the rapid growth of research publication…

Few-Shot Learning

TiAb Review Plugin: A Browser-Based Tool for AI-Assisted Title and Abstract Screening

2026-04-08 · Yuki Kataoka, Masahiro Banno, Michihito Kyo, Shuri Nakao 외 arxiv

Background: Server-based screening tools impose subscription costs, while open-source alternatives require coding skills. Objectives: We developed a browser extension that provides no-code, serverless artificial intellig…

Active Learning

Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models

2023-05-01 · Eddie Guo, Mehul Gupta, Jiawen Deng, Ye-Jean Park 외

Objective: To assess the performance of the OpenAI GPT API in accurately and efficiently identifying relevant titles and abstracts from real-world clinical review datasets and compare its performance against ground truth…

Sensitivity