paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Leveraging LLMs for Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Review: A Cost-Effective Dynamic Few-Shot Learning Approach

2025-12-12 · Yun-Chung Liu, Rui Yang, Jonathan Chong Kai Liew, Ziran Yin, Henry Foote, Christopher J. Lindsell, Chuan Hong arxiv

Systematic reviews are a key component of evidence-based medicine, playing a critical role in synthesizing existing research evidence and guiding clinical decisions. However, with the rapid growth of research publications, conducting systematic reviews has become increasingly burdensome, with title and abstract screening being one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps. To mitigate this issue, we designed a two-stage dynamic few-shot learning (DFSL) approach aimed at improving the efficiency and performance of large language models (LLMs) in the title and abstract screening task. Specifically, this approach first uses a low-cost LLM for initial screening, then re-evaluates low-confidence instances using a high-performance LLM, thereby enhancing screening performance while controlling computational costs. We evaluated this approach across 10 systematic reviews, and the results demonstrate its strong generalizability and cost-effectiveness, with potential to reduce manual screening burden and accelerate the systematic review process in practical applications.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.11261

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Few-Shot Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Promise and Challenges of Using LLMs to Accelerate the Screening Process of Systematic Reviews

2024-04-24 · Aleksi Huotala, Miikka Kuutila, Paul Ralph, Mika Mäntylä

Systematic review (SR) is a popular research method in software engineering (SE). However, conducting an SR takes an average of 67 weeks. Thus, automating any step of the SR process could reduce the effort associated wit…

Text Simplification

Fine-Tuning A Large Language Model for Systematic Review Screening

2026-03-25 · Kweku Yamoah, Noah Schroeder, Emmanuel Dorley, Neha Rani 외 arxiv

Systematic reviews traditionally have taken considerable amounts of human time and energy to complete, in part due to the extensive number of titles and abstracts that must be reviewed for potential inclusion. Recently, …

Streamlining Systematic Reviews: A Novel Application of Large Language Models

2024-12-14 · Fouad Trad, Ryan Yammine, Jana Charafeddine, Marlene Chakhtoura 외

Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential for evidence-based guidelines but are often limited by the time-consuming nature of literature screening. We propose and evaluate an in-house system based on Large Language Models (…

ArticlesPrompt EngineeringRAGRetrieval-augmented Generation+1

AISysRev -- LLM-based Tool for Title-abstract Screening

2025-10-08 · Aleksi Huotala, Miikka Kuutila, Olli-Pekka Turtio, Simo Sipilä 외 arxiv

Conducting systematic reviews is laborious. In the screening or study selection phase, the number of papers can be overwhelming. Recent research has demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can perform title-abstra…

Beyond Accuracy: LLM Variability in Evidence Screening for Software Engineering SLRs

2026-04-29 · Gilberto Sussumu Hida, Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro, Erika Yahata arxiv

Context: Study screening in systematic literature reviews is costly, inconsistency-prone, and risk-asymmetric, since false negatives can compromise validity. Despite rapid uptake of Large Language Models (LLMs), there is…