paper-with-me

Papers

AlphaAlign: Incentivizing Safety Alignment with Extremely Simplified Reinforcement Learning

2025-07-20 · Yi Zhang, An Zhang, XiuYu Zhang, Leheng Sheng, Yuxin Chen, Zhenkai Liang, Xiang Wang arxiv

Large language models (LLMs), despite possessing latent safety understanding from their vast pretraining data, remain vulnerable to generating harmful content and exhibit issues such as over-refusal and utility degradation after safety alignment. Current safety alignment methods often result in superficial refusal shortcuts or rely on intensive supervision for reasoning-based approaches, failing to fully leverage the model's intrinsic safety self-awareness. We propose \textbf{AlphaAlign}, a simple yet effective pure reinforcement learning (RL) framework with verifiable safety reward designed to incentivize this latent safety awareness through proactive safety reasoning.} AlphaAlign employs a dual-reward system: a verifiable safety reward encourages correctly formatted and explicitly justified refusals for harmful queries while penalizing over-refusals, and a normalized helpfulness reward guides high-quality responses to benign inputs. This allows the model to develop proactive safety reasoning capabilities without depending on supervised safety-specific reasoning data. AlphaAlign demonstrates three key advantages: (1) Simplicity and efficiency, requiring only binary prompt safety labels and minimal RL steps for substantial improvements. (2) Breaking the safety-utility trade-off, by enhancing refusal of harmful content and reducing over-refusals, while simultaneously maintaining or even improving general task performance and robustness to unseen jailbreaks. (3) Deep alignment, fostering proactive safety reasoning that generates explicit safety rationales rather than relying on shallow refusal patterns.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2507.14987

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

RSafe: Incentivizing proactive reasoning to build robust and adaptive LLM safeguards

2025-06-09 · Jingnan Zheng, Xiangtian Ji, Yijun Lu, Chenhang Cui 외

Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to exhibit vulnerabilities despite deliberate safety alignment efforts, posing significant risks to users and society. To safeguard against the risk of policy-violating content, syst…

Safety Alignment

Safety Tax: Safety Alignment Makes Your Large Reasoning Models Less Reasonable

2025-03-01 · Tiansheng Huang, Sihao Hu, Fatih Ilhan, Selim Furkan Tekin 외

Safety alignment is an important procedure before the official deployment of a Large Language Model (LLM). While safety alignment has been extensively studied for LLM, there is still a large research gap for Large Reason…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelSafety Alignment

My Precious Crash Data: Barriers and Opportunities in Encouraging Autonomous Driving Companies to Share Safety-Critical Data

2025-04-10 · Hauke Sandhaus, Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, Wendy Ju, Qian Yang

Safety-critical data, such as crash and near-crash records, are crucial to improving autonomous vehicle (AV) design and development. Sharing such data across AV companies, academic researchers, regulators, and the public…

Autonomous Driving

Aligned but Blind: Alignment Increases Implicit Bias by Reducing Awareness of Race

2025-05-30 · Lihao Sun, Chengzhi Mao, Valentin Hofmann, Xuechunzi Bai

Although value-aligned language models (LMs) appear unbiased in explicit bias evaluations, they often exhibit stereotypes in implicit word association tasks, raising concerns about their fair usage. We investigate the me…

Machine Unlearning

aiXamine: Simplified LLM Safety and Security

2025-04-21 · Fatih Deniz, Dorde Popovic, Yazan Boshmaf, Euisuh Jeong 외

Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) for safety and security remains a complex task, often requiring users to navigate a fragmented landscape of ad hoc benchmarks, datasets, metrics, and reporting formats. To address …

2kAdversarial RobustnessFairnessHallucination+2