An Empirical Comparison of SVM and Some Supervised Learning Algorithms for Vowel recognition
In this article, we conduct a study on the performance of some supervised learning algorithms for vowel recognition. This study aims to compare the accuracy of each algorithm. Thus, we present an empirical comparison between five supervised learning classifiers and two combined classifiers: SVM, KNN, Naive Bayes, Quadratic Bayes Normal (QDC) and Nearst Mean. Those algorithms were tested for vowel recognition using TIMIT Corpus and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs).
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
An Empirical Study on L2 Accents of Cross-lingual Text-to-Speech Systems via Vowel Space
With the recent developments in cross-lingual Text-to-Speech (TTS) systems, L2 (second-language, or foreign) accent problems arise. Moreover, running a subjective evaluation for such cross-lingual TTS systems is troubles…
text-to-speechText to SpeechMachine Assisted Analysis of Vowel Length Contrasts in Wolof
Growing digital archives and improving algorithms for automatic analysis of text and speech create new research opportunities for fundamental research in phonetics. Such empirical approaches allow statistical evaluation …
Empirical Analysis of Oral and Nasal Vowels of Konkani
Konkani is a highly nasalised language which makes it unique among Indo-Aryan languages. This work investigates the acoustic-phonetic properties of Konkani oral and nasal vowels. For this study, speech samples from six s…
Speech SynthesisAcoustic Characterization of Singaporean Children's English: Comparisons to American and British Counterparts
We investigate English pronunciation patterns in Singaporean children in relation to their American and British counterparts by conducting archetypal analysis on selected vowel pairs. Given that Singapore adopts British …
Position