An explainability study of the constant Q cepstral coefficient spoofing countermeasure for automatic speaker verification
Anti-spoofing for automatic speaker verification is now a well established area of research, with three competitive challenges having been held in the last 6 years. A great deal of research effort over this time has been invested into the development of front-end representations tailored to the spoofing detection task. One such approach known as constant Q cepstral coefficients (CQCCs) have been shown to be especially effective in detecting attacks implemented with a unit selection based speech synthesis algorithm. Despite their success, they largely fail in detecting other forms of spoofing attack where more traditional front-end representations give substantially better results. Similar differences were also observed in the most recent, 2019 edition of the ASVspoof challenge series. This paper reports our attempts to help explain these observations. The explanation is shown to lie in the level of attention paid by each front-end to different sub-band components of the spectrum. Thus far, surprisingly little has been learned about what artefacts are being detected by spoofing countermeasures. Our work hence aims to shed light upon signal or spectrum level artefacts that serve to distinguish different forms of spoofing attack from genuine, bone fide speech. With a better understanding of these artefacts we will be better positioned to design more reliable countermeasures.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Speaker VerificationSpeech SynthesisSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A Comparison of Features for Replay Attack Detection
Speaker verification (ASV) systems are still vulnerable to different kinds of spoofing attacks, especially replay attack due to high-quality playback devices. Many countermeasures have been developed recently. Most of th…
Speaker VerificationDNN Filter Bank Cepstral Coefficients for Spoofing Detection
With the development of speech synthesis techniques, automatic speaker verification systems face the serious challenge of spoofing attack. In order to improve the reliability of speaker verification systems, we develop a…
Speaker VerificationSpeech SynthesisReplay Spoofing Countermeasure Using Autoencoder and Siamese Network on ASVspoof 2019 Challenge
Automatic Speaker Verification (ASV) is the process of identifying a person based on the voice presented to a system. Different synthetic approaches allow spoofing to deceive ASV systems (ASVs), whether using techniques …
Speaker VerificationSpeech SynthesisVoice ConversionThe SYSU System for the Interspeech 2015 Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing and Countermeasures Challenge
Many existing speaker verification systems are reported to be vulnerable against different spoofing attacks, for example speaker-adapted speech synthesis, voice conversion, play back, etc. In order to detect these spoofe…
Speaker VerificationSpeech SynthesisVoice ConversionA Spoofing Benchmark for the 2018 Voice Conversion Challenge: Leveraging from Spoofing Countermeasures for Speech Artifact Assessment
Voice conversion (VC) aims at conversion of speaker characteristic without altering content. Due to training data limitations and modeling imperfections, it is difficult to achieve believable speaker mimicry without intr…
BenchmarkingSpeaker VerificationVoice Conversion