paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Annotating Korean adnominal ending constructions in corpus data: Beyond relative-clause identification

2026-07-04 · Jungyeul Park, Chulwoo Park arxiv

The Korean adnominal ending \texttt{ETM} occurs in diverse noun-modifying constructions, including relative-clause-like modifiers, adjectival and copular forms, bound-noun constructions, and lexicalized expressions. This paper argues that \texttt{ETM} is not a direct marker of relative-clause structure, but a morphological exponent shared by several adnominal constructions. We propose a corpus-based typology that distinguishes these constructions using predicate type, auxiliary structure, argument-structural compatibility, head-noun restriction, and lexicalized patterns. We operationalize the typology as a construction-sensitive annotation layer for the KLUE dependency treebank, implemented through an ordered rule-based procedure and evaluated by manual validation. Productive relative-clause-like uses account for 39.4\% of the analyzed instances; the remainder consists mainly of adjectival, copular, bound-nominal, modal, temporal, and collocational constructions. The findings show that Korean relative-clause-like modification cannot be identified from adnominal morphology alone.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.03681

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

On What an Adnominal Appendix Modifies in Korean Adjunct RDCs

2016-10-01 · PACLIC 2016 10 · Daeho Chung

UD-KSL Treebank v1.3: A semi-automated framework for aligning XPOS-extracted units with UPOS tags

2025-06-10 · Hakyung Sung, Gyu-Ho Shin, Chanyoung Lee, You Kyung Sung 외

The present study extends recent work on Universal Dependencies annotations for second-language (L2) Korean by introducing a semi-automated framework that identifies morphosyntactic constructions from XPOS sequences and …

Dependency Parsing

K-SNACS: Annotating Korean Adposition Semantics

2020-12-01 · DMR (COLING) 2020 12 · Jena D. Hwang, Hanwool Choe, Na-Rae Han, Nathan Schneider

While many languages use adpositions to encode semantic relationships between content words in a sentence (e.g., agentivity or temporality), the details of how adpositions work vary widely across languages with respect t…

Sentence

Annotating Causal Language Using Corpus Lexicography of Constructions

2015-06-01 · WS 2015 6 · Jesse Dunietz, Lori Levin, Jaime Carbonell

Variation in Universal Dependencies annotation: A token-based typological case study on adpossessive constructions

2020-12-01 · UDW (COLING) 2020 12 · Kaius Sinnemäki, Viljami Haakana

In this paper we present a method for identifying and analyzing adnominal possessive constructions in 66 Universal Dependencies treebanks. We classify adpossessive constructions in terms of their morphological type (locu…