paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Arbitrage: Efficient Reasoning via Advantage-Aware Speculation

2025-12-04 · Monishwaran Maheswaran, Rishabh Tiwari, Yuezhou Hu, Kerem Dilmen, Coleman Hooper, Haocheng Xi, Nicholas Lee, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Michael W. Mahoney, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami arxiv

Modern Large Language Models achieve impressive reasoning capabilities with long Chain of Thoughts, but they incur substantial computational cost during inference, and this motivates techniques to improve the performance-cost ratio. Among these techniques, Speculative Decoding accelerates inference by employing a fast but inaccurate draft model to autoregressively propose tokens, which are then verified in parallel by a more capable target model. However, due to unnecessary rejections caused by token mismatches in semantically equivalent steps, traditional token-level Speculative Decoding struggles in reasoning tasks. Although recent works have shifted to step-level semantic verification, which improve efficiency by accepting or rejecting entire reasoning steps, existing step-level methods still regenerate many rejected steps with little improvement, wasting valuable target compute. To address this challenge, we propose Arbitrage, a novel step-level speculative generation framework that routes generation dynamically based on the relative advantage between draft and target models. Instead of applying a fixed acceptance threshold, Arbitrage uses a lightweight router trained to predict when the target model is likely to produce a meaningfully better step. This routing approximates an ideal Arbitrage Oracle that always chooses the higher-quality step, achieving near-optimal efficiency-accuracy trade-offs. Across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks, Arbitrage consistently surpasses prior step-level Speculative Decoding baselines, reducing inference latency by up to $\sim2\times$ at matched accuracy.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.05033

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Mathematical Reasoning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Is the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging a statistical arbitrage?

2024-07-20 · Pascal François, Geneviève Gauthier, Frédéric Godin, Carlos Octavio Pérez Mendoza

The recent work of Horikawa and Nakagawa (2024) claims that under a complete market admitting statistical arbitrage, the difference between the hedging position provided by deep hedging and that of the replicating portfo…

Position

Speculation in Procurement Auctions

2022-03-06 · Shanglyu Deng

A speculator can take advantage of a procurement auction by acquiring items for sale before the auction. The accumulated market power can then be exercised in the auction and may lead to a large enough gain to cover the …

Reducing Latency of LLM Search Agent via Speculation-based Algorithm-System Co-Design

2025-11-25 · Zixiao Huang, Wen Zeng, Tianyu Fu, Tengxuan Liu 외 arxiv

LLM-based search agents achieve strong performance but suffer from severe latency, as each step requires serialized LLM reasoning followed by action of tool execution. We revisit this bottleneck through the lens of specu…

DualSpec: Accelerating Deep Research Agents via Dual-Process Action Speculation

2026-03-08 · Shuzhang Zhong, Baotong Lu, Qi Chen, Chuanjie Liu 외 arxiv

Large language model-based deep research agents have been increasingly popular for addressing long-horizon information-seeking tasks, but they often incur high end-to-end latency due to extensive reasoning and frequent t…

Repeated Auctions with Speculators: Arbitrage Incentives and Forks in DAOs

2025-05-27 · Nicolas Eschenbaum, Nicolas Greber

We analyze the vulnerability of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) to speculative exploitation via their redemption mechanisms. Studying a game-theoretic model of repeated auctions for governance shares with s…