paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Open Source Software for Efficient and Transparent Reviews

2020-06-22 · Rens van de Schoot, Jonathan de Bruin, Raoul Schram, Parisa Zahedi, Jan de Boer, Felix Weijdema, Bianca Kramer, Martijn Huijts, Maarten Hoogerwerf, Gerbrich Ferdinands, Albert Harkema, Joukje Willemsen, Yongchao Ma, Qixiang Fang, Sybren Hindriks, Lars Tummers, Daniel Oberski

To help researchers conduct a systematic review or meta-analysis as efficiently and transparently as possible, we designed a tool (ASReview) to accelerate the step of screening titles and abstracts. For many tasks - including but not limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses - the scientific literature needs to be checked systematically. Currently, scholars and practitioners screen thousands of studies by hand to determine which studies to include in their review or meta-analysis. This is error prone and inefficient because of extremely imbalanced data: only a fraction of the screened studies is relevant. The future of systematic reviewing will be an interaction with machine learning algorithms to deal with the enormous increase of available text. We therefore developed an open source machine learning-aided pipeline applying active learning: ASReview. We demonstrate by means of simulation studies that ASReview can yield far more efficient reviewing than manual reviewing, while providing high quality. Furthermore, we describe the options of the free and open source research software and present the results from user experience tests. We invite the community to contribute to open source projects such as our own that provide measurable and reproducible improvements over current practice.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2006.12166

Code (1)

asreview/paper-asreview-introduction 공식 구현 tf

Tasks

Active LearningBIG-bench Machine Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Investigating Autonomous Agent Contributions in the Wild: Activity Patterns and Code Change over Time

2026-04-01 · Razvan Mihai Popescu, David Gros, Andrei Botocan, Rahul Pandita 외 arxiv

The rise of large language models for code has reshaped software development. Autonomous coding agents, able to create branches, open pull requests, and perform code reviews, now actively contribute to real-world project…

Paper Copilot Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process

2025-02-02 · Jing Yang

The rapid growth of submissions to top-tier Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) conferences has prompted many venues to transition from closed to open review platforms. Some have fully embraced open pe…

Position

Mining Software Quality from Software Reviews: Research Trends and Open Issues

2016-02-05 · Issa Atoum, Ahmed Otoom

Software review text fragments have considerably valuable information about users experience. It includes a huge set of properties including the software quality. Opinion mining or sentiment analysis is concerned with an…

Opinion MiningSentiment Analysis

AiReview: An Open Platform for Accelerating Systematic Reviews with LLMs

2025-04-05 · Xinyu Mao, Teerapong Leelanupab, Martin Potthast, Harrisen Scells 외

Systematic reviews are fundamental to evidence-based medicine. Creating one is time-consuming and labour-intensive, mainly due to the need to screen, or assess, many studies for inclusion in the review. Several tools hav…

A Research Roadmap for Augmenting Software Engineering Processes and Software Products with Generative AI

2025-10-30 · Domenico Amalfitano, Andreas Metzger, Marco Autili, Tommaso Fulcini 외 arxiv

Generative AI (GenAI) is rapidly transforming software engineering (SE) practices, influencing how SE processes are executed, as well as how software systems are developed, operated, and evolved. This paper applies desig…