ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks
Despite remarkable advancements in mitigating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) by retrieval augmentation, it remains challenging to measure the reliability of LLMs using static question-answering (QA) data. Specifically, given the potential of data contamination (e.g., leading to memorization), good static benchmark performance does not ensure that model can reliably use the provided evidence for responding, which is essential to avoid hallucination when the required knowledge is new or private. Inspired by adversarial machine learning, we investigate the feasibility of automatically perturbing existing static one for dynamic evaluation. Specifically, this paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases for evaluating the LLMs' reliability in using new evidence for answering. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets on a collection of LLMs under various prompting settings. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in LLM. Accurate models on static data are observed to produce unsupported answers from the perturbed evidence, with pronounced accuracy drops across LLMs including GPT-4. We find that our adversarial examples are transferable across all considered LLMs. The examples generated by a small model can be used to evaluate a much larger model, making our approach cost-effective.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
HallucinationHallucination EvaluationLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelMemorizationNatural QuestionsOpen-Domain Question AnsweringQuestion AnsweringRetrievalMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Removal of Hallucination on Hallucination: Debate-Augmented RAG
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances factual accuracy by integrating external knowledge, yet it introduces a critical issue: erroneous or biased retrieval can mislead generation, compounding hallucinations, a ph…
HallucinationRAGRetrievalRetrieval-augmented GenerationReal-Time Evaluation Models for RAG: Who Detects Hallucinations Best?
This article surveys Evaluation models to automatically detect hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and presents a comprehensive benchmark of their performance across six RAG applications. Methods incl…
HallucinationHallucination EvaluationLanguage ModelingLanguage Modelling+3AutoRAG-HP: Automatic Online Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Recent advancements in Large Language Models have transformed ML/AI development, necessitating a reevaluation of AutoML principles for the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. To address the challenges of hyper-…
AutoMLEfficient ExplorationNatural QuestionsRAG+2Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models
Large language models (LMs) are prone to generate factual errors, which are often called hallucinations. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations and argue that hallucinations manifest in di…
HallucinationRetrievalCausal-Enhanced AI Agents for Medical Research Screening
Systematic reviews are essential for evidence-based medicine, but reviewing 1.5 million+ annual publications manually is infeasible. Current AI approaches suffer from hallucinations in systematic review tasks, with studi…
Knowledge Graphs