Benchmarking common uncertainty estimation methods with histopathological images under domain shift and label noise
In the past years, deep learning has seen an increase in usage in the domain of histopathological applications. However, while these approaches have shown great potential, in high-risk environments deep learning models need to be able to judge their uncertainty and be able to reject inputs when there is a significant chance of misclassification. In this work, we conduct a rigorous evaluation of the most commonly used uncertainty and robustness methods for the classification of Whole Slide Images, with a focus on the task of selective classification, where the model should reject the classification in situations in which it is uncertain. We conduct our experiments on tile-level under the aspects of domain shift and label noise, as well as on slide-level. In our experiments, we compare Deep Ensembles, Monte-Carlo Dropout, Stochastic Variational Inference, Test-Time Data Augmentation as well as ensembles of the latter approaches. We observe that ensembles of methods generally lead to better uncertainty estimates as well as an increased robustness towards domain shifts and label noise, while contrary to results from classical computer vision benchmarks no systematic gain of the other methods can be shown. Across methods, a rejection of the most uncertain samples reliably leads to a significant increase in classification accuracy on both in-distribution as well as out-of-distribution data. Furthermore, we conduct experiments comparing these methods under varying conditions of label noise. Lastly, we publish our code framework to facilitate further research on uncertainty estimation on histopathological data.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
BenchmarkingClassificationData AugmentationVariational Inferencewhole slide imagesMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Arctique: An artificial histopathological dataset unifying realism and controllability for uncertainty quantification
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is crucial for reliable image segmentation. Yet, while the field sees continual development of novel methods, a lack of agreed-upon benchmarks limits their systematic comparison and evalua…
BenchmarkingImage SegmentationMedical DiagnosisSemantic Segmentation+1Focused Active Learning for Histopathological Image Classification
Active Learning (AL) has the potential to solve a major problem of digital pathology: the efficient acquisition of labeled data for machine learning algorithms. However, existing AL methods often struggle in realistic se…
Active LearningClassificationHistopathological Image Classificationimage-classification+2Uncertainty Estimation with Deep Learning for Rainfall-Runoff Modelling
Deep Learning is becoming an increasingly important way to produce accurate hydrological predictions across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. Uncertainty estimations are critical for actionable hydrological fo…
BenchmarkingDeep LearningBenchmarking Scalable Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Organ Segmentation
Deep learning based methods for automatic organ segmentation have shown promise in aiding diagnosis and treatment planning. However, quantifying and understanding the uncertainty associated with model predictions is cruc…
BenchmarkingMedical Image AnalysisOrgan SegmentationOut-of-Distribution Detection+2Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review
Histopathological images (HIs) are the gold standard for evaluating some types of tumors for cancer diagnosis. The analysis of such images is not only time and resource consuming, but also very challenging even for exper…
BIG-bench Machine Learning