paper-with-me

Papers

Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacy

2015-01-24 · Thomas Steinke, Jonathan Ullman

We show a new lower bound on the sample complexity of $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-differentially private algorithms that accurately answer statistical queries on high-dimensional databases. The novelty of our bound is that it depends optimally on the parameter $\delta$, which loosely corresponds to the probability that the algorithm fails to be private, and is the first to smoothly interpolate between approximate differential privacy ($\delta > 0$) and pure differential privacy ($\delta = 0$). Specifically, we consider a database $D \in \{\pm1\}^{n \times d}$ and its \emph{one-way marginals}, which are the $d$ queries of the form "What fraction of individual records have the $i$-th bit set to $+1$?" We show that in order to answer all of these queries to within error $\pm \alpha$ (on average) while satisfying $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy, it is necessary that $$ n \geq \Omega\left( \frac{\sqrt{d \log(1/\delta)}}{\alpha \varepsilon} \right), $$ which is optimal up to constant factors. To prove our lower bound, we build on the connection between \emph{fingerprinting codes} and lower bounds in differential privacy (Bun, Ullman, and Vadhan, STOC'14). In addition to our lower bound, we give new purely and approximately differentially private algorithms for answering arbitrary statistical queries that improve on the sample complexity of the standard Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms for achieving worst-case accuracy guarantees by a logarithmic factor.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1501.06095

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Limits of Differential Privacy in Online Learning

2024-11-08 · Bo Li, Wei Wang, Peng Ye

Differential privacy (DP) is a formal notion that restricts the privacy leakage of an algorithm when running on sensitive data, in which privacy-utility trade-off is one of the central problems in private data analysis. …

Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacy

2014-07-10 · Amos Beimel, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer

We compare the sample complexity of private learning [Kasiviswanathan et al. 2008] and sanitization~[Blum et al. 2008] under pure $\epsilon$-differential privacy [Dwork et al. TCC 2006] and approximate $(\epsilon,\delta)…

Purifying Approximate Differential Privacy with Randomized Post-processing

2025-03-27 · Yingyu Lin, Erchi Wang, Yi-An Ma, Yu-Xiang Wang

We propose a framework to convert $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-approximate Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms into $(\varepsilon, 0)$-pure DP mechanisms, a process we call ``purification''. This algorithmic technique levera…

Computational Efficiency

Tractable MCMC for Private Learning with Pure and Gaussian Differential Privacy

2023-10-23 · Yingyu Lin, Yi-An Ma, Yu-Xiang Wang, Rachel Redberg 외

Posterior sampling, i.e., exponential mechanism to sample from the posterior distribution, provides $\varepsilon$-pure differential privacy (DP) guarantees and does not suffer from potentially unbounded privacy breach in…

Max-Information, Differential Privacy, and Post-Selection Hypothesis Testing

2016-04-13 · Ryan Rogers, Aaron Roth, Adam Smith, Om Thakkar

In this paper, we initiate a principled study of how the generalization properties of approximate differential privacy can be used to perform adaptive hypothesis testing, while giving statistically valid $p$-value correc…

Two-sample testingvalid