Can Language Models Recognize Convincing Arguments?
The capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about their potential to create and propagate convincing narratives. Here, we study their performance in detecting convincing arguments to gain insights into LLMs' persuasive capabilities without directly engaging in experimentation with humans. We extend a dataset by Durmus and Cardie (2018) with debates, votes, and user traits and propose tasks measuring LLMs' ability to (1) distinguish between strong and weak arguments, (2) predict stances based on beliefs and demographic characteristics, and (3) determine the appeal of an argument to an individual based on their traits. We show that LLMs perform on par with humans in these tasks and that combining predictions from different LLMs yields significant performance gains, surpassing human performance. The data and code released with this paper contribute to the crucial effort of continuously evaluating and monitoring LLMs' capabilities and potential impact. (https://go.epfl.ch/persuasion-llm)
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
MisinformationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Emotionally Charged, Logically Blurred: AI-driven Emotional Framing Impairs Human Fallacy Detection
Logical fallacies are common in public communication and can mislead audiences; fallacious arguments may still appear convincing despite lacking soundness, because convincingness is inherently subjective. We present the …
Logical FallaciesAssessing Convincingness of Arguments in Online Debates with Limited Number of Features
We propose a new method in the field of argument analysis in social media to determining convincingness of arguments in online debates, following previous research by Habernal and Gurevych (2016). Rather than using argum…
Argument MiningFinding Convincing Arguments Using Scalable Bayesian Preference Learning
We introduce a scalable Bayesian preference learning method for identifying convincing arguments in the absence of gold-standard rat- ings or rankings. In contrast to previous work, we avoid the need for separate methods…
Active LearningVariational InferenceWord EmbeddingsWhich argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTM
Length, Interchangeability, and External Knowledge: Observations from Predicting Argument Convincingness
In this work, we provide insight into three key aspects related to predicting argument convincingness. First, we explicitly display the power that text length possesses for predicting convincingness in an unsupervised se…
Semantic Composition