paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Can LLMs Make (Personalized) Access Control Decisions?

2025-11-25 · Friederike Groschupp, Daniele Lain, Aritra Dhar, Lara Magdalena Lazier, Srdjan Čapkun arxiv

Precise access control decisions are crucial for the security of both traditional applications and emerging agent-based systems. Typically, these decisions are made by users during app installation or at runtime. However, due to the increasing complexity and automation of systems, making access control decisions can impose a significant cognitive burden on users, often overwhelming them and leading to suboptimal or even arbitrary choices. To address this problem, we investigate the ability of LLMs to make dynamic, context-aware decisions aligned with users' security preferences, expressed during a lightweight setup phase. As a case study, we analyze smartphone application permission requests, given their ubiquity and users' familiarity with them. We curated a dataset comprising 307 user privacy statements (short, natural-language descriptions of user preferences) and 14,682 corresponding permission decisions, gathered from smartphone users in an online data collection. We compare these decisions with those made by two versions of LLMs that are tasked with reasoning about the app and the request context: a general model and a personalized one (which incorporates user preferences). For the latter, we also collected user feedback on 1,298 of its decisions. Our results show that LLMs generally reflect users' preferences well, agreeing with the majority decision in up to 86% of cases, and can steer users toward safer behavior. However, the results also reveal a key trade-off in personalization: while incorporating user-specific privacy preferences improves agreement with individual decisions, strict adherence to these preferences may lead to less safe outcomes, as users tend to over-permission.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.20284

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

GPT, Ontology, and CAABAC: A Tripartite Personalized Access Control Model Anchored by Compliance, Context and Attribute

2024-03-13 · Raza Nowrozy, Khandakar Ahmed, Hua Wang

As digital healthcare evolves, the security of electronic health records (EHR) becomes increasingly crucial. This study presents the GPT-Onto-CAABAC framework, integrating Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT), medical…

Attribute

LLM-hRIC: LLM-empowered Hierarchical RAN Intelligent Control for O-RAN

2025-04-25 · Lingyan Bao, Sinwoong Yun, Jemin Lee, Tony Q. S. Quek

Despite recent advances in applying large language models (LLMs) and machine learning (ML) techniques to open radio access network (O-RAN), critical challenges remain, such as insufficient cooperation between radio acces…

ManagementReinforcement Learning (RL)

Decision-aid or Controller? Steering Human Decision Makers with Algorithms

2023-03-23 · RuQing Xu, Sarah Dean

Algorithms are used to aid human decision makers by making predictions and recommending decisions. Currently, these algorithms are trained to optimize prediction accuracy. What if they were optimized to control final dec…

ReLay: Personalized LLM-Generated Plain-Language Summaries for Better Understanding, but at What Cost?

2026-05-01 · Joey Chan, Yikun Han, Jingyuan Chen, Samuel Fang 외 arxiv

Plain Language Summaries (PLS) aim to make research accessible to lay readers, but they are typically written in a one-size-fits-all style that ignores differences in readers' information needs and comprehension. In heal…

Personalized Recommendations in EdTech: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

2022-08-30 · Keshav Agrawal, Susan Athey, Ayush Kanodia, Emil Palikot

We study the impact of personalized content recommendations on the usage of an educational app for children. In a randomized controlled trial, we show that the introduction of personalized recommendations increases the c…

Recommendation Systems