Can political gridlock undermine checks and balances? A lab experiment
If checks and balances are aimed at protecting citizens from the government's abuse of power, why do they sometimes weaken them? We address this question in a laboratory experiment in which subjects choose between two decision rules: with and without checks and balances. Voters may prefer an unchecked executive if that enables a reform that, otherwise, is blocked by the legislature. Consistent with our predictions, we find that subjects are more likely to weaken checks and balances when there is political gridlock. However, subjects weaken the controls not only when the reform is beneficial but also when it is harmful.
Code (1)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Populist Discourse and Entrepreneurship: The Role of Political Ideology and Institutions
Using institutional economic theory as our guiding framework, we develop a model to describe how populist discourse by a nation's political leader influences entrepreneurship. We hypothesize that populist discourse reduc…
Judicial Favoritism of Politicians: Evidence from Small Claims Court
Multiple studies have documented racial, gender, political ideology, or ethnical biases in comparative judicial systems. Supplementing this literature, we investigate whether judges rule cases differently when one of the…
Debiasing Large Language Models in Thai Political Stance Detection via Counterfactual Calibration
Political stance detection in low-resource and culturally complex settings poses a critical challenge for large language models (LLMs). In the Thai political landscape - marked by indirect language, polarized figures, an…
Zero-shot GeneralizationData AugmentationStance DetectionMulti-agent systems with CBF-based controllers -- collision avoidance and liveness from instability
Assuring system stability is typically a major control design objective. In this paper, we present a system where instability provides a crucial benefit. We consider multi-agent collision avoidance using Control Barrier …
Collision AvoidanceA Checks-and-Balances Framework for Context-Aware Ethical AI Alignment
This paper introduces a checks-and-balances framework for ethical alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs), inspired by three-branch governmental systems. It implements three independent yet interacting components: LLMs…
Self-Supervised Learning