paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Comparison Patrols on Drifting Orders: Certified Rank Maintenance, Evolving Planar Maxima, and Selection under Drifting Fitness

2026-06-12 · Faruk Alpay, Levent Sarioglu arxiv

Rank-based selection in dynamic environments acts on order information that becomes stale while it is being used. Tournaments, elitism, truncation, and Pareto selection may therefore consume rankings that no longer match the current fitness order, while full re-evaluation competes with search for the same budget. This paper formulates the missing information layer as a data-structure problem. A hidden total order on $n$ items drifts by adjacent transpositions, while a maintainer receives one truthful pairwise comparison per step and must answer rank queries continuously. We introduce the comparison patrol, a constant-time maintained-order structure using $3n+O(1)$ words, one comparison per update, deterministic verification-age bounds, and per-item displacement certificates. We prove lower bounds showing that oblivious and location-oblivious maintainers incur expected Kendall error $Ω(\min(α,1)n)$, and show that the patrol operates at the same order. A bump invariant yields exact self-stabilization after drift-free corruption: if the maximum rank overstatement is $L$, recovery takes at most $L$ aligned cycles and cannot finish before $L-1$. This gives a deterministic shock-recovery calculus and a crossover with full rebuild near $L\approx \log_2 n$. The maintained order is then transferred to evolving planar maxima and to evolutionary selection rules, giving deterministic bounds for truncation, tournament, elitist, and two-objective Pareto decisions under drifting fitness. Experiments up to $n=65{,}536$ audit the certificates, recovery laws, equilibrium behavior, and equal-budget dynamic evolutionary loops, identifying when certified local rank maintenance outperforms global re-evaluation and when it should hand over.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.15022

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

DriftXpress: Faster Drifting Models via Projected RKHS Fields

2026-05-12 · Ali Falahati, Elliot Creager, Gautam Kamath, Shubhankar Mohapatra arxiv

Drifting Models have emerged as a new paradigm for one-step generative modeling, achieving strong image quality without iterative inference. The premise is to replace the iterative denoising process in diffusion models w…

Drifting Models for Surrogate Flow Modeling

2026-06-05 · Chris R. Jung, Markus Dörr, Natalie Jüngling, Jennifer Niessner 외 arxiv

While Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) provides high-fidelity flow fields for optimizing indoor environments, its computational cost limits rapid exploration. To solve this problem generative surrogates offer better di…

Policing Chronic and Temporary Hot Spots of Violent Crime: A Controlled Field Experiment

2020-11-11 · Dylan J. Fitzpatrick, Wilpen L. Gorr, Daniel B. Neill

Hot-spot-based policing programs aim to deter crime through increased proactive patrols at high-crime locations. While most hot spot programs target easily identified chronic hot spots, we introduce models for predicting…

Neural Network Tire Force Modeling for Automated Drifting

2024-07-18 · Nicholas Drake Broadbent, Trey Weber, Daiki Mori, J. Christian Gerdes

Automated drifting presents a challenge problem for vehicle control, requiring models and control algorithms that can precisely handle nonlinear, coupled tire forces at the friction limits. We present a neural network ar…

Friction

When Do Conservation Laws Survive Learned Representations? Certified Horizons for Latent World Models

2026-06-23 · Hongbo Wang arxiv

We ask a representation-learning question about physical world models: when does a conservation law remain certifiable after a model learns a latent representation? A certified horizon bounds -- in advance, from measurab…

Representation Learning