paper-with-me

Papers

Constraint-Aware Refinement for Safety Verification of Neural Feedback Loops

2024-09-30 · Nicholas Rober, Jonathan P. How

Neural networks (NNs) are becoming increasingly popular in the design of control pipelines for autonomous systems. However, since the performance of NNs can degrade in the presence of out-of-distribution data or adversarial attacks, systems that have NNs in their control pipelines, i.e., neural feedback loops (NFLs), need safety assurances before they can be applied in safety-critical situations. Reachability analysis offers a solution to this problem by calculating reachable sets that bound the possible future states of an NFL and can be checked against dangerous regions of the state space to verify that the system does not violate safety constraints. Since exact reachable sets are generally intractable to calculate, reachable set over approximations (RSOAs) are typically used. The problem with RSOAs is that they can be overly conservative, making it difficult to verify the satisfaction of safety constraints, especially over long time horizons or for highly nonlinear NN control policies. Refinement strategies such as partitioning or symbolic propagation are typically used to limit the conservativeness of RSOAs, but these approaches come with a high computational cost and often can only be used to verify safety for simple reachability problems. This paper presents Constraint-Aware Refinement for Verification (CARV): an efficient refinement strategy that reduces the conservativeness of RSOAs by explicitly using the safety constraints on the NFL to refine RSOAs only where necessary. We demonstrate that CARV can verify the safety of an NFL where other approaches either fail or take up to 60x longer and 40x the memory.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2410.00145

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study

2026-04-16 · Michal Töpfer, František Plášil, Tomáš Bureš, Petr Hnětynka arxiv

Vibe coding inherently assumes iterative refinement of LLM-generated code through feedback loops. While effective for conventional software tasks, its reliability in runtime-adaptive systems is unclear -- especially when…

LAD-VF: LLM-Automatic Differentiation Enables Fine-Tuning-Free Robot Planning from Formal Methods Feedback

2025-09-22 · Yunhao Yang, Junyuan Hong, Gabriel Jacob Perin, Zhiwen Fan 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) can translate natural language instructions into executable action plans for robotics, autonomous driving, and other domains. Yet, deploying LLM-driven planning in the physical world demands …

Prompt EngineeringAutonomous DrivingRobot Navigation

Generating Automotive Code: Large Language Models for Software Development and Verification in Safety-Critical Systems

2025-06-04 · Sven Kirchner, Alois C. Knoll

Developing safety-critical automotive software presents significant challenges due to increasing system complexity and strict regulatory demands. This paper proposes a novel framework integrating Generative Artificial In…

BenchmarkingCode GenerationModel Selectiontest driven development

SVR: Self-Verifying Refinement via Joint Verdict-Confidence Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Test-Time Compute

2026-07-30 · Hongyu Chen, Liang Lin, Guangrun Wang arxiv

Scaling test-time computation can improve language-model reasoning, but uniform budgets waste computation on easy inputs, while verifier-guided refinement relies on external feedback. We introduce Self-Verifying Refineme…

Mathematical ReasoningReinforcement Learning

ProgCo: Program Helps Self-Correction of Large Language Models

2025-01-02 · Xiaoshuai Song, Yanan Wu, Weixun Wang, Jiaheng Liu 외

Self-Correction aims to enable large language models (LLMs) to self-verify and self-refine their initial responses without external feedback. However, LLMs often fail to effectively self-verify and generate correct feedb…

Instruction Following