Continuous Subject-in-the-Loop Integration: Centering AI on Marginalized Communities
Despite its utopian promises as a disruptive equalizer, AI - like most tools deployed under the guise of neutrality - has tended to simply reinforce existing social structures. To counter this trend, radical AI calls for centering on the marginalized. We argue that gaps in key infrastructure are preventing the widespread adoption of radical AI, and propose a guiding principle for both identifying these infrastructure gaps and evaluating whether proposals for new infrastructure effectively center marginalized voices.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Cross-subject Decoding of Eye Movement Goals from Local Field Potentials
Objective. We consider the cross-subject decoding problem from local field potential (LFP) signals, where training data collected from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of a source subject is used to decode intended motor acti…
DecoderTransfer LearningBlack Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression
This paper unapologetically reflects on the critical role that Black feminism can and should play in abolishing algorithmic oppression. Positioning algorithmic oppression in the broader field of feminist science and tech…
DiversityFairnessToxicity Inspector: A Framework to Evaluate Ground Truth in Toxicity Detection Through Feedback
Toxic language is difficult to define, as it is not monolithic and has many variations in perceptions of toxicity. This challenge of detecting toxic language is increased by the highly contextual and subjectivity of its …
Entity-Centric Information Access with Human in the Loop for the Biomedical Domain
In this paper, we describe the concept of entity-centric information access for the biomedical domain. With entity recognition technologies approaching acceptable levels of accuracy, we put forward a paradigm of document…
ManagementWinoQueer: A Community-in-the-Loop Benchmark for Anti-LGBTQ+ Bias in Large Language Models
We present WinoQueer: a benchmark specifically designed to measure whether large language models (LLMs) encode biases that are harmful to the LGBTQ+ community. The benchmark is community-sourced, via application of a nov…