ControversialQA: Exploring Controversy in Question Answering
Controversy is widespread online. Previous studies mainly define controversy based on vague assumptions of its relation to sentiment such as hate speech and offensive words. This paper introduces the first question-answering dataset that defines content controversy by user perception, i.e., votes from plenty of users. It contains nearly 10K questions, and each question has a best answer and a most controversial answer. Experimental results reveal that controversy detection in question answering is essential and challenging, and there is no strong correlation between controversy and sentiment tasks.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Question AnsweringSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Exploring Question Understanding and Adaptation in Neural-Network-Based Question Answering
The last several years have seen intensive interest in exploring neural-network-based models for machine comprehension (MC) and question answering (QA). In this paper, we approach the problems by closely modelling questi…
Question AnsweringReading ComprehensionExploring the Role of Logically Related Non-Question Phrases for Answering Why-Questions
In this paper, we show that certain phrases although not present in a given question/query, play a very important role in answering the question. Exploring the role of such phrases in answering questions not only reduces…
Exploring Markov Logic Networks for Question Answering
An Interactive System for Exploring Community Question Answering Forums
We present an interactive system to provide effective and efficient search capabilities in Community Question Answering (cQA) forums. The system integrates state-of-the-art technology for answer search with a Web-based u…
Community Question AnsweringQuestion Answering