paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Critique-RL: Training Language Models for Critiquing through Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning

2025-10-28 · Zhiheng Xi, Jixuan Huang, Xin Guo, Boyang Hong, Dingwen Yang, Xiaoran Fan, Shuo Li, Zehui Chen, Junjie Ye, Siyu Yuan, Zhengyin Du, Xuesong Yao, Yufei Xu, Jiecao Chen, Rui Zheng, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang arxiv

Training critiquing language models to assess and provide feedback on model outputs is a promising way to improve LLMs for complex reasoning tasks. However, existing approaches typically rely on stronger supervisors for annotating critique data. To address this, we propose Critique-RL, an online RL approach for developing critiquing language models without stronger supervision. Our approach operates on a two-player paradigm: the actor generates a response, the critic provides feedback, and the actor refines the response accordingly. We first reveal that relying solely on indirect reward signals from the actor's outputs for RL optimization often leads to unsatisfactory critics: while their helpfulness (i.e., providing constructive feedback) improves, the discriminability (i.e., determining whether a response is high-quality or not) remains poor, resulting in marginal performance gains. To overcome this, Critique-RL adopts a two-stage optimization strategy. In stage I, it reinforces the discriminability of the critic with direct rule-based reward signals; in stage II, it introduces indirect rewards based on actor refinement to improve the critic's helpfulness, while maintaining its discriminability via appropriate regularization. Extensive experiments across various tasks and models show that Critique-RL delivers substantial performance improvements. For example, it achieves a 9.02% gain on in-domain tasks and a 5.70% gain on out-of-domain tasks for Qwen2.5-7B, highlighting its potential.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.24320

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators

2022-06-12 · William Saunders, Catherine Yeh, Jeff Wu, Steven Bills 외

We fine-tune large language models to write natural language critiques (natural language critical comments) using behavioral cloning. On a topic-based summarization task, critiques written by our models help humans find …

DeepCritic: Deliberate Critique with Large Language Models

2025-05-01 · Wenkai Yang, Jingwen Chen, Yankai Lin, Ji-Rong Wen

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving, providing accurate feedback and scalable oversight on their outputs becomes an urgent and critical problem. Leveraging LLMs as critique models to achieve automated su…

Math

Positive and Negative Critiquing for VAE-based Recommenders

2022-04-05 · Diego Antognini, Boi Faltings

Providing explanations for recommended items allows users to refine the recommendations by critiquing parts of the explanations. As a result of revisiting critiquing from the perspective of multimodal generative models, …

CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning

2024-02-22 · Zicheng Lin, Zhibin Gou, Tian Liang, Ruilin Luo 외

The ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to critique and refine their reasoning is crucial for their application in evaluation, feedback provision, and self-improvement. This paper introduces CriticBench, a comprehens…

Benchmarking

Scalable Oversight for Superhuman AI via Recursive Self-Critiquing

2025-02-07 · Xueru Wen, Jie Lou, Xinyu Lu, Junjie Yang 외

As AI capabilities increasingly surpass human proficiency in complex tasks, current alignment techniques including SFT and RLHF face fundamental challenges in ensuring reliable oversight. These methods rely on direct hum…