paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

CryptoBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Expert-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency

2025-11-29 · Jiacheng Guo, Suozhi Huang, Zixin Yao, Yifan Zhang, Yifu Lu, Jiashuo Liu, Zihao Li, Nicholas Deng, Qixin Xiao, Jia Tian, Kanghong Zhan, Tianyi Li, Xiaochen Liu, Jason Ge, Chaoyang He, Kaixuan Huang, Lin Yang, Wenhao Huang, Mengdi Wang arxiv

This paper introduces CryptoBench, the first expert-curated, dynamic benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the real-world capabilities of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in the uniquely demanding and fast-paced cryptocurrency domain. Unlike general-purpose agent benchmarks for search and prediction, professional crypto analysis presents specific challenges: \emph{extreme time-sensitivity}, \emph{a highly adversarial information environment}, and the critical need to synthesize data from \emph{diverse, specialized sources}, such as on-chain intelligence platforms and real-time Decentralized Finance (DeFi) dashboards. CryptoBench thus serves as a much more challenging and valuable scenario for LLM agent assessment. To address these challenges, we constructed a live, dynamic benchmark featuring 50 questions per month, expertly designed by crypto-native professionals to mirror actual analyst workflows. These tasks are rigorously categorized within a four-quadrant system: Simple Retrieval, Complex Retrieval, Simple Prediction, and Complex Prediction. This granular categorization enables a precise assessment of an LLM agent's foundational data-gathering capabilities alongside its advanced analytical and forecasting skills. Our evaluation of ten LLMs, both directly and within an agentic framework, reveals a performance hierarchy and uncovers a failure mode. We observe a \textit{retrieval-prediction imbalance}, where many leading models, despite being proficient at data retrieval, demonstrate a pronounced weakness in tasks requiring predictive analysis. This highlights a problematic tendency for agents to appear factually grounded while lacking the deeper analytical capabilities to synthesize information.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.00417

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

CryptoX : Compositional Reasoning Evaluation of Large Language Models

2025-02-08 · Jiajun Shi, Chaoren Wei, Liqun Yang, Zekun Moore Wang 외

The compositional reasoning capacity has long been regarded as critical to the generalization and intelligence emergence of large language models LLMs. However, despite numerous reasoning-related benchmarks, the composit…

ExpertLongBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Expert-Level Long-Form Generation Tasks with Structured Checklists

2025-06-02 · Jie Ruan, Inderjeet Nair, Shuyang Cao, Amy Liu 외

This paper introduces ExpertLongBench, an expert-level benchmark containing 11 tasks from 9 domains that reflect realistic expert workflows and applications. Beyond question answering, the application-driven tasks in Exp…

BenchmarkingFormQuestion Answering

VoiceAgentEval: A Dual-Dimensional Benchmark for Expert-Level Intelligent Voice-Agent Evaluation of Xbench's Professional-Aligned Series

2025-10-24 · Pengyu Xu, Shijia Li, Ao Sun, Feng Zhang 외 arxiv

We propose OutboundEval, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in expert-level intelligent outbound calling scenarios. Unlike existing methods that suffer from three key limitations - insu…

Harder Tasks Need More Experts: Dynamic Routing in MoE Models

2024-03-12 · Quzhe Huang, Zhenwei An, Nan Zhuang, Mingxu Tao 외

In this paper, we introduce a novel dynamic expert selection framework for Mixture of Experts (MoE) models, aiming to enhance computational efficiency and model performance by adjusting the number of activated experts ba…

Computational EfficiencyMixture-of-Experts

IMProofBench: Benchmarking AI on Research-Level Mathematical Proof Generation

2025-09-30 · Johannes Schmitt, Gergely Bérczi, Jasper Dekoninck, Jeremy Feusi 외 arxiv

As the mathematical capabilities of large language models (LLMs) improve, it becomes increasingly important to evaluate their performance on research-level tasks at the frontier of mathematical knowledge. However, existi…