paper-with-me

Papers

CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding

2026-01-05 · Chenyang Ma, Guangyu Yang, Kai Lu, Shitong Xu, Bill Byrne, Niki Trigoni, Andrew Markham arxiv

Current work on robot failure detection and correction typically operates in a post hoc manner, analyzing errors and applying corrections only after failures occur. This work introduces CycleVLA, a system that equips Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) with proactive self-correction, the capability to anticipate incipient failures and recover before they fully manifest during execution. CycleVLA achieves this by integrating a progress-aware VLA that flags critical subtask transition points where failures most frequently occur, a VLM-based failure predictor and planner that triggers subtask backtracking upon predicted failure, and a test-time scaling strategy based on Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding to improve retry success after backtracking. Extensive experiments on the LIBERO and LIBERO-Plus simulation benchmarks show that CycleVLA surpasses the state-of-the-art VLA π0.5, improves success rates by correcting execution failures across VLAs of varying capability, from under-trained ones to fully converged policies, and that MBR serves as an effective zero-shot test-time scaling strategy for VLAs. On a real robot, CycleVLA reaches a 91% average success rate on one precise and two long-horizon manipulation tasks. We further conduct stress tests with multiple manually injected perturbations (e.g., swapping in a distractor at the expected location while relocating the true target object mid-execution), where CycleVLA corrects ~80% of injected failures and maintains success rates comparable to unperturbed execution. Project Page: https://dannymcy.github.io/cyclevla/

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2601.02295

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework for LLM-Based Agent Memory

2025-09-29 · Qianshan Wei, Tengchao Yang, Yaochen Wang, Xinfeng Li 외 arxiv

Large Language Model (LLM) agents use memory to learn from past interactions, enabling autonomous planning and decision-making in complex environments. However, this reliance on memory introduces a critical security risk…

MACAROON: Training Vision-Language Models To Be Your Engaged Partners

2024-06-20 · Shujin Wu, Yi R. Fung, Sha Li, Yixin Wan 외

Large vision-language models (LVLMs), while proficient in following instructions and responding to diverse questions, invariably generate detailed responses even when questions are ambiguous or unanswerable, leading to h…

Reflective Confidence: Correcting Reasoning Flaws via Online Self-Correction

2025-12-21 · Qinglin Zeng, Jing Yang, Keze Wang arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on complex reasoning tasks using techniques such as chain-of-thought and self-consistency. However, ensemble-based approaches, especially self-consistency whi…

Mathematical Reasoning

Self-Correcting Code Generation Using Small Language Models

2025-05-29 · Jeonghun Cho, Deokhyung Kang, Hyounghun Kim, Gary Geunbae Lee

Self-correction has demonstrated potential in code generation by allowing language models to revise and improve their outputs through successive refinement. Recent studies have explored prompting-based strategies that in…

Code GenerationHumanEvalmbpp

Self-Correcting Decoding with Generative Feedback for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models

2025-02-10 · Ce Zhang, Zifu Wan, Zhehan Kan, Martin Q. Ma 외

While recent Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable performance in multi-modal tasks, they are prone to generating hallucinatory text responses that do not align with the given visual input, which res…

Image GenerationResponse GenerationText to Image GenerationText-to-Image Generation