CytoFormer: A Molecularly Supervised Cell Foundation Model for Histopathology Cell Classification
Identifying cell types directly from routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology would enable single-cell analysis at scale, but training such models has relied on manual pathologist annotations, which are slow, expensive and unreliable for many cell types. We instead supervise morphology with molecules. Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics profiles individual cells in situ on a section that can afterwards be stained with H&E, so that molecular identity and morphology are observed for the same physical cell. We assembled 81 such paired Xenium sections spanning 16 organs, derived per-cell labels by clustering, marker-gene annotation, organ-wise human review and quality control, and mapped them onto the cell types commonly reported in each organ. This yielded 15.4 million cells, each with a paired H&E image patch and one of 23 cell types, on which we trained CytoFormer, a cell foundation model with a multi-task, per-organ classification head. On spatially held-out tissue CytoFormer reached an accuracy of 0.85 and a macro-F1 of 0.78 across all 16 organs, and its predictions reproduced the tissue architecture of an entire held-out section. The representation also transfers: with the encoder frozen, a linear head on CytoFormer features performed better than six pathology foundation models on four expert-annotated benchmarks, including on organs and cell types that were not part of pretraining. Finally, in an interactive active-learning setting, CytoFormer's embeddings are markedly more label-efficient than existing pathology foundation models, detecting normal epithelium amid look-alike tumour with an F1 of 0.82 from only a few annotations and leading the strongest baseline by 0.13 in F1. CytoFormer turns paired H&E and spatial transcriptomics into a reusable, label-efficient representation for cell-level analysis of routine histology.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Analysis of Cellular Feature Differences of Astrocytomas with Distinct Mutational Profiles Using Digitized Histopathology Images
Cellular phenotypic features derived from histopathology images are the basis of pathologic diagnosis and are thought to be related to underlying molecular profiles. Due to overwhelming cell numbers and population hetero…
ClusteringDimensionality ReductionMind the Gap: Evaluating Patch Embeddings from General-Purpose and Histopathology Foundation Models for Cell Segmentation and Classification
Recent advancements in foundation models have transformed computer vision, driving significant performance improvements across diverse domains, including digital histopathology. However, the advantages of domain-specific…
Cell SegmentationDecoderInstance SegmentationModel Selection+3Atlas H&E-TME: Scalable AI-Based Tissue Profiling at Expert Pathologist-Level Accuracy
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining is the cornerstone of histopathology, yet scalable, quantitative analysis of H&E whole-slide images (WSIs) remains a central challenge in computational pathology. We present Atlas H&E…
MINT: Molecularly Informed Training with Spatial Transcriptomics Supervision for Pathology Foundation Models
Pathology foundation models learn morphological representations through self-supervised pretraining on large-scale whole-slide images, yet they do not explicitly capture the underlying molecular state of the tissue. Spat…
Benchmarking Computational Pathology Foundation Models For Semantic Segmentation
In recent years, foundation models such as CLIP, DINO,and CONCH have demonstrated remarkable domain generalization and unsupervised feature extraction capabilities across diverse imaging tasks. However, systematic and in…
Semantic SegmentationDomain GeneralizationNuclear Segmentation