Deciphering Scientific Reasoning Steps from Outcome Data for Molecule Optimization
Emerging reasoning models hold promise for automating scientific discovery. However, their training is hindered by a critical supervision gap: experimental outcomes are abundant, whereas intermediate reasoning steps are rarely documented at scale. To bridge this gap, we propose DESRO, a framework for deciphering scientific reasoning from outcomes. By analyzing shared patterns and key differences within grouped data, a large language model (LLM) can recover the underlying logic. We instantiate this framework in molecule optimization, a pivotal stage in drug discovery that traditionally relies on the iterative reasoning of medicinal chemists. Across 2.3 million molecular property records, our framework infers optimization rationales by grouping molecules with shared fragments, then using an LLM to analyze how structural variations correlate with property differences. Based on the derived data, we train a model that conducts molecule optimization through an interpretable reasoning process. DESRO achieves the highest success rates on 15 out of 18 tasks, spanning both single- and multi-property optimization of bioactivity and ADMET properties. The reasoning process enables robust generalization to out-of-distribution scenarios, including novel property combinations, unseen biological targets, and unseen properties defined solely by natural language descriptions. In retrospective case studies under strict temporal splits, the model autonomously reconstructs expert-level lead optimization trajectories. Additionally, our framework extends beyond molecule optimization to reaction ligand selection. Our results establish deciphering reasoning steps from outcome data as a viable paradigm for enabling scientific reasoning, providing a scalable approach to accelerate scientific discovery.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Drug DiscoverySimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Deciphering the Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Chain-of-Thought: Probability, Memorization, and Noisy Reasoning
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to enhance the multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, debates persist about whether LLMs exhibit abstract generalization or rely on sha…
MemorizationRAISE: Enhancing Scientific Reasoning in LLMs via Step-by-Step Retrieval
Scientific reasoning requires not only long-chain reasoning processes, but also knowledge of domain-specific terminologies and adaptation to updated findings. To deal with these challenges for scientific reasoning, we in…
Problem DecompositionRetrievalSymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic Verification
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as data-driven reasoners, yet their chains-of-thought (CoT) can be unfaithful even when final answers are correct. Most existing ``verification'' signals are not diagnostic…
Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback
Recent work has shown that asking language models to generate reasoning steps improves performance on many reasoning tasks. When moving beyond prompting, this raises the question of how we should supervise such models: o…
Arithmetic ReasoningGSM8KMathOVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoning
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with maintaining accuracy throughout multiple multiple reasoning steps, especially in mathematical reasoning where an error in earlier steps can propagate to subsequent ones an…
Arithmetic ReasoningGSM8KMathematical Reasoning