paper-with-me

Papers

Decoding Hidden Deception in Reasoning LLMs: Activation Explainers for Deception Auditing

2026-06-16 · Kexin Chen, Yi Liu, Haonan Zhang, Yanhui Li, Xinyu Deng, Dongxia Wang arxiv

As LLMs acquire stronger reasoning capabilities, deceptive behavior becomes an increasingly serious safety concern. Existing deception monitors either score visible transcripts or derive scalar probe scores from representation vectors, leaving little inspectable evidence about why a response is suspicious. We introduce STATEWITNESS, an activation explainer for deception auditing. A separate decoder reads a target model's hidden states, then answers natural-language queries or emits structured reports about them. We evaluate STATEWITNESS on two target reasoning LLMs across seven deception datasets. STATEWITNESS reaches 0.916 mean AUROC, a relative gain of 11.6% over the best black-box text monitor and 25.0% over the best activation-probe baseline under the same evaluation protocol. When combined with existing monitors, STATEWITNESS reduces missed deceptive examples in simple threshold ensembles. Beyond scalar detection, the decoder returns query-level answers, schema reports, and token- or sentence-level evidence traces for human inspection. We view this interface as a potential building block for broader interpretability and alignment tools.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.17478

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

When Thinking LLMs Lie: Unveiling the Strategic Deception in Representations of Reasoning Models

2025-06-05 · Kai Wang, Yihao Zhang, Meng Sun

The honesty of large language models (LLMs) is a critical alignment challenge, especially as advanced systems with chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning may strategically deceive humans. Unlike traditional honesty issues on L…

HallucinationMisinformation

Beyond Prompt-Induced Lies: Investigating LLM Deception on Benign Prompts

2025-08-08 · Zhaomin Wu, Mingzhe Du, See-Kiong Ng, Bingsheng He arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely deployed in reasoning, planning, and decision-making tasks, making their trustworthiness critical. A significant and underexplored risk is intentional deception, where an LLM delib…

Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluation of the Deception Detection Capabilities of LLMs in Multimodal Settings

2025-06-11 · Md Messal Monem Miah, Adrita Anika, Xi Shi, Ruihong Huang

Detecting deception in an increasingly digital world is both a critical and challenging task. In this study, we present a comprehensive evaluation of the automated deception detection capabilities of Large Language Model…

Deception Detection

DeceptGuard :A Constitutional Oversight Framework For Detecting Deception in LLM Agents

2026-03-14 · Snehasis Mukhopadhyay arxiv

Reliable detection of deceptive behavior in Large Language Model (LLM) agents is an essential prerequisite for safe deployment in high-stakes agentic contexts. Prior work on scheming detection has focused exclusively on …

ThinkDeception: A Progressive Reinforcement Learning Framework for Interpretable Multimodal Deception Detection

2026-06-17 · Jinhao Song, Shan Liang, Yiqun Yue, Zhuhuayang Zhang 외 arxiv

Multimodal deception detection is critical for identifying fraudulent intentions, yet existing approaches predominantly rely on end to end black--box paradigms. These methods suffer from a severe lack of interpretability…

Reinforcement LearningBinary Classification