Do Vision-Language-Action Models Mean What They Say? On the Role of Faithfulness in Embodied Reasoning
Embodied Chain-of-Thought has emerged as a promising mechanism to enhance robot decision-making and interpretability in black-box Vision-Language Action (VLA) models. However, whether this verbalized Chain-of-Thought truthfully reflects the policy's underlying decision process remains poorly understood. We distinguish between functional reasoning, in which reasoning improves task performance, and faithful reasoning, in which reasoning truly reflects the policy's internal decision process. We argue that SoTA alignment strategies offer a necessary but insufficient notion of faithfulness, admitting reasoning whose intermediate steps can mask the causal links in action prediction through confounding factors (e.g., reasoning that is ungrounded in the environment and internally disconnected or inconsistent), restricting policy generalization. We study this gap through a human evaluation of a SoTA reasoning model for autonomous driving, revealing an inconsistent coupling between reasoning quality and downstream trajectory improvement. We then operationalize a behavioral surrogate for embodied faithfulness through a learned critic, Pinocchio, scoring observation grounding and stepwise coherence, and use this critic as a dense reward signal in post-training an embodied policy with reinforcement learning. Across withheld driving benchmarks, our post-trained planner improves faithfulness by 4% and 18% over SoTA alignment and trajectory error post-training baselines, respectively, while maintaining competitive downstream task performance. Finally, on a synthetic out-of-distribution test set, post-training for faithfulness improves policy responsiveness to rare counterfactual scenarios by 1.6x that of a SoTA policy, suggesting that faithful reasoning traces contribute to more robust, generalizable, and interpretable embodied intelligence. Project page: https://mjf-su.github.io/pinocchio/
Code (2)
Tasks
Reinforcement LearningAutonomous DrivingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Reference Games as a Testbed for the Alignment of Model Uncertainty and Clarification Requests
In human conversation, both interlocutors play an active role in maintaining mutual understanding. When listeners are uncertain about what speakers mean, for example, they can request clarification. It is an open questio…
Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models What to See and Where to Look
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for end-to-end autonomous driving. However, existing VLAs' training relies heavily on text-centric visual question answering and chain-of-thought r…
Visual Question AnsweringTrajectory PredictionAutonomous DrivingPIGLeT: Language Grounding Through Neuro-Symbolic Interaction in a 3D World
We propose PIGLeT: a model that learns physical commonsense knowledge through interaction, and then uses this knowledge to ground language. We factorize PIGLeT into a physical dynamics model, and a separate language mode…
Language ModelingLanguage ModellingSentenceWhat Makes a Maze Look Like a Maze?
A unique aspect of human visual understanding is the ability to flexibly interpret abstract concepts: acquiring lifted rules explaining what they symbolize, grounding them across familiar and unfamiliar contexts, and mak…
Visual ReasoningLatent Compass: Creation by Navigation
In Marius von Senden's Space and Sight, a newly sighted blind patient describes the experience of a corner as lemon-like, because corners "prick" sight like lemons prick the tongue. Prickliness, here, is a dimension in t…
Image Manipulation