Does Mixture-of-Experts Actually Help Inference on Consumer and Edge Hardware? An Empirical Study
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models are often described as ideal for resource-constrained inference. Each token activates only a small subset of experts, so the per-token compute cost, in floating-point operations (FLOPs), resembles that of a much smaller dense model. Whether that FLOP advantage survives in practice is far less clear. We ask whether MoE models actually run faster and cheaper than comparable dense models on consumer-grade and edge hardware. We benchmark OLMoE-1B-7B (1.3 B active of 6.9 B total) against three dense baselines on an Apple M2 Pro and an NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB through llama$.$cpp, measuring throughput, memory, and on-device energy. The answer is device-dependent: OLMoE's active-parameter advantage is only partly realised on the laptop (~10% behind the same-active Llama-3.2-1B) and erodes on the edge device (~31% behind, at 2.1$\times$ the energy per token, with peak memory at the 8 GB ceiling). Patching llama$.$cpp to time the decode graph node-by-node shows routing accounts for under 9% of MoE-block compute on the cleaner edge backend, so the gap reflects total-parameter memory footprint, expert dispatch, and KV-cache pressure rather than routing. The implication is that on bandwidth-bound edge hardware, inference cost tracks total parameters, not active ones, and sparse activation does not buy back what the device is constrained on. These findings are bounded to one MoE model at this parameter scale and two devices, and we release the full measurement harness and per-run data.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Elastic MoE: Unlocking the Inference-Time Scalability of Mixture-of-Experts
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models typically fix the number of activated experts $k$ at both training and inference. However, real-world deployments often face heterogeneous hardware, fluctuating workloads, and diverse qual…
Geometric Regularization in Mixture-of-Experts: The Disconnect Between Weights and Activations
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models achieve efficiency through sparse activation, but the role of geometric regularization in expert specialization remains unclear. We apply orthogonality loss to enforce expert diversity and…
MoFE: Mixture of Factual Experts for Controlling Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization
Neural abstractive summarization models are susceptible to generating factually inconsistent content, a phenomenon known as hallucination. This limits the usability and adoption of these systems in real-world application…
Abstractive Text SummarizationHallucinationMixture of Tunable Experts - Behavior Modification of DeepSeek-R1 at Inference Time
We present the Mixture-of-Tunable-Experts (MoTE), a method that extends the Mixture-of-Experts architecture of Large Language Models (LLMs). Without additional training, MoTE enables meaningful and focused behavior chang…
Mixture-of-ExpertsThe Other Half of the Memory Wall: Serving 35B MoEs from SSD with Trained Routing Prediction
Mixture-of-experts (MoE) inference on consumer hardware is bounded by weight memory: a 35B-class model is 19.5GB at 4-bit, and sparsity shrinks the compute per token, not the bytes that must be held. Naive offloading to …