Does Self-supervised Learning Really Improve Reinforcement Learning from Pixels?
We investigate whether self-supervised learning (SSL) can improve online reinforcement learning (RL) from pixels. We extend the contrastive reinforcement learning framework (e.g., CURL) that jointly optimizes SSL and RL losses and conduct an extensive amount of experiments with various self-supervised losses. Our observations suggest that the existing SSL framework for RL fails to bring meaningful improvement over the baselines only taking advantage of image augmentation when the same amount of data and augmentation is used. We further perform evolutionary searches to find the optimal combination of multiple self-supervised losses for RL, but find that even such a loss combination fails to meaningfully outperform the methods that only utilize carefully designed image augmentations. After evaluating these approaches together in multiple different environments including a real-world robot environment, we confirm that no single self-supervised loss or image augmentation method can dominate all environments and that the current framework for joint optimization of SSL and RL is limited. Finally, we conduct the ablation study on multiple factors and demonstrate the properties of representations learned with different approaches.
Code (2)
Tasks
Image Augmentationreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)Self-Supervised LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Keep It SimPool: Who Said Supervised Transformers Suffer from Attention Deficit?
Convolutional networks and vision transformers have different forms of pairwise interactions, pooling across layers and pooling at the end of the network. Does the latter really need to be different? As a by-product of p…
Image ClassificationImage RetrievalMetric LearningObject Discovery+3On the Safety of Open-Sourced Large Language Models: Does Alignment Really Prevent Them From Being Misused?
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented performance in Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks. However, many existing studies have shown that they could be misused to generate undesired content. In resp…
Text GenerationDoes On-Policy Distillation Really Distill? From Noisy Teacher to Self-Improvement
On-policy distillation (OPD) offers dense token-level supervision as an alternative to the sparse outcome-level advantages of reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). However, the teacher scores student-gen…
Reinforcement LearningRemoving the need for ground truth UWB data collection: self-supervised ranging error correction using deep reinforcement learning
Indoor positioning using UWB technology has gained interest due to its centimeter-level accuracy potential. However, multipath effects and non-line-of-sight conditions cause ranging errors between anchors and tags. Exist…
Deep Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningIs MixIT Really Unsuitable for Correlated Sources? Exploring MixIT for Unsupervised Pre-training in Music Source Separation
In music source separation (MSS), obtaining isolated sources or stems is highly costly, making pre-training on unlabeled data a promising approach. Although source-agnostic unsupervised learning like mixture-invariant tr…
Music Source SeparationUnsupervised Pre-training