paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Don't Mask the Environment: Observation Supervision Changes How Agents Explore Under RL

2026-09-17 · Juzheng Zhang, Disha Makhija, Manoj Ghuhan Arivazhagan, Vinayshekhar Bannihatti Kumar, Rashmi Gangadharaiah hf

Agent trajectories record what an agent does and what happens next. Yet standard supervised fine-tuning (SFT) applies loss only to agent-authored action tokens, using environment observations as context but not as prediction targets. We ask whether this convention provides the best initialization for subsequent reinforcement learning. We introduce ActObs, which also supervises the observation tokens already present in each trajectory. Although deployed agents never generate observations, learning to predict them encourages the policy to model action consequences without adding data, parameters, sequence tokens, or forward passes. The methods perform similarly after SFT but diverge after GRPO. On Qwen3-4B, GRPO from ActObs achieves higher pass@k at every evaluated sampling budget than its action-only counterpart on Terminal-Bench 2.0. On Qwen3-8B, it trades some pass@1 reliability for higher pass@k (+3.4 pp at pass@16) and solves more distinct tasks. The advantage extends to cross-domain code editing on aider-polyglot (+4.2 pp at pass@1 at 4B), whose tasks are unseen during SFT and RL. ActObs retains more entropy during RL while requiring less policy movement, leaving the final policy closer to its SFT initialization. Our analysis traces this difference to SFT: action and observation gradients rapidly become orthogonal, while action-only training leaves a large residual observation gradient and degrades environment prediction below the base model. Joint supervision prevents this one-sided specialization, preserving consequence prediction and preparing the policy for downstream exploration.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2609.20715

Code (2)

Aaron617/agent-arXiv-daily ★ 10
Valiant-Cat/hfpaper

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

ECHO: Terminal Agents Learn World Models for Free

2026-05-23 · Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Piero Kauffmann, Ahmed Awadallah, Dimitris Papailiopoulos arxiv

CLI agents are the closest thing language models have to an embodied setting: the model emits commands, the terminal executes them, and the returned stream -- stdout, errors, files, logs, and traces -- records the conseq…

ACC: Compiling Agent Trajectories for Long-Context Training

2026-05-21 · Qisheng Su, Zhen Fang, Shiting Huang, Yu Zeng 외 arxiv

Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs. However, training LLMs for this capacity requires costly long-document curation or heuristic context synthesis. We observe that…

Coreference Resolution

Segment to Focus: Guiding Latent Action Models in the Presence of Distractors

2026-02-02 · Marcus Fechner, Hamza Adnan, Constantin C. Lüth, Matthew T. Jackson 외 arxiv

Latent action models (LAMs) offer a promising path to pre-training embodied agents on large amounts of action-free video. They infer latent actions between consecutive observations that can later be decoded to ground-tru…

ALAN: Autonomously Exploring Robotic Agents in the Real World

2023-02-13 · Russell Mendonca, Shikhar Bahl, Deepak Pathak

Robotic agents that operate autonomously in the real world need to continuously explore their environment and learn from the data collected, with minimal human supervision. While it is possible to build agents that can l…

Investigating the Impact of Observation Space Design Choices On Training Reinforcement Learning Solutions for Spacecraft Problems

2025-01-10 · Nathaniel Hamilton, Kyle Dunlap, Kerianne L Hobbs

Recent research using Reinforcement Learning (RL) to learn autonomous control for spacecraft operations has shown great success. However, a recent study showed their performance could be improved by changing the action s…

Reinforcement Learning (RL)