Driving pattern interpretation based on action phases clustering
Current approaches to identifying driving heterogeneity face challenges in comprehending fundamental patterns from the perspective of underlying driving behavior mechanisms. The concept of Action phases was proposed in our previous work, capturing the diversity of driving characteristics with physical meanings. This study presents a novel framework to further interpret driving patterns by classifying Action phases in an unsupervised manner. In this framework, a Resampling and Downsampling Method (RDM) is first applied to standardize the length of Action phases. Then the clustering calibration procedure including ''Feature Selection'', ''Clustering Analysis'', ''Difference/Similarity Evaluation'', and ''Action phases Re-extraction'' is iteratively applied until all differences among clusters and similarities within clusters reach the pre-determined criteria. Application of the framework using real-world datasets revealed six driving patterns in the I80 dataset, labeled as ''Catch up'', ''Keep away'', and ''Maintain distance'', with both ''Stable'' and ''Unstable'' states. Notably, Unstable patterns are more numerous than Stable ones. ''Maintain distance'' is the most common among Stable patterns. These observations align with the dynamic nature of driving. Two patterns ''Stable keep away'' and ''Unstable catch up'' are missing in the US101 dataset, which is in line with our expectations as this dataset was previously shown to have less heterogeneity. This demonstrates the potential of driving patterns in describing driving heterogeneity. The proposed framework promises advantages in addressing label scarcity in supervised learning and enhancing tasks such as driving behavior modeling and driving trajectory prediction.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Clusteringfeature selectionTrajectory PredictionMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Emergent dynamical phases and collective motion in termites
Termites which are able to forage in the open can be often seen, in the field or in the lab: (i) wandering around, forming no observable pattern, or (ii) clustering themselves in a dense and almost immobile pack, or (iii…
ClusteringIdentification of Driving Heterogeneity using Action-chains
Current approaches to identifying driving heterogeneity face challenges in capturing the diversity of driving characteristics and understanding the fundamental patterns from a driving behaviour mechanism standpoint. This…
DiversitySegmentationA Large-Language-Model Supported Personalized Driving Framework for Lane Change in Highway Scenarios
Personalized driving can improve the user acceptance of automated driving systems. However, existing methods still provide limited support for translating natural-language driving preferences, especially when such prefer…
Computational Measurement of Team-Process Phase Dynamics in Collaborative Virtual Reality
Collaborative virtual reality (VR) environments make team communication observable as it unfolds, but conventional transcript analyses often summarize entire trials or divide them into fixed temporal windows. Such approa…
Boundary DetectionAutomatic Identification of Driving Maneuver Patterns using a Robust Hidden Semi-Markov Models
There is an increase in interest to model driving maneuver patterns via the automatic unsupervised clustering of naturalistic sequential kinematic driving data. The patterns learned are often used in transportation resea…
Clustering