paper-with-me

Papers

Efficient Reasoning with Balanced Thinking

2026-03-12 · Yulin Li, Tengyao Tu, Li Ding, Junjie Wang, Huiling Zhen, Yixin Chen, Yong Li, Zhuotao Tian arxiv

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet they often suffer from overthinking, expending redundant computational steps on simple problems, or underthinking, failing to explore sufficient reasoning paths despite inherent capabilities. These issues lead to inefficiencies and potential inaccuracies, limiting practical deployment in resource-constrained settings. Existing methods to mitigate overthinking, such as suppressing reflective keywords or adjusting reasoning length, may inadvertently induce underthinking, compromising accuracy. Therefore, we propose ReBalance, a training-free framework that achieves efficient reasoning with balanced thinking. ReBalance leverages confidence as a continuous indicator of reasoning dynamics, identifying overthinking through high confidence variance and underthinking via consistent overconfidence. By aggregating hidden states from a small-scale dataset into reasoning mode prototypes, we compute a steering vector to guide LRMs' reasoning trajectories. A dynamic control function modulates this vector's strength and direction based on real-time confidence, pruning redundancy during overthinking, and promoting exploration during underthinking. Extensive experiments conducted on four models ranging from 0.5B to 32B, and across nine benchmarks in math reasoning, general question answering, and coding tasks demonstrate that ReBalance effectively reduces output redundancy while improving accuracy, offering a general, training-free, and plug-and-play strategy for efficient and robust LRM deployment. Project page and code are available at https://rebalance-ai.github.io .

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.12372

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Question Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Do Thinking Tokens Help or Trap? Towards More Efficient Large Reasoning Model

2025-06-30 · Bowen Ding, Yuhan Chen, Futing Wang, Lingfeng Ming 외

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at solving complex problems but face an overthinking dilemma. When handling simple tasks, they often produce verbose responses overloaded with thinking tokens (e.g., wait, however). Th…

Math

Increasing the Thinking Budget is Not All You Need

2025-12-22 · Ignacio Iacobacci, Zhaozhi Qian, Faroq AL-Tam, Muhammad AL-Qurishi 외 arxiv

Recently, a new wave of thinking-capable Large Language Models has emerged, demonstrating exceptional capabilities across a wide range of reasoning benchmarks. Early studies have begun to explore how the amount of comput…

Exploring Efficiency Frontiers of Thinking Budget in Medical Reasoning: Scaling Laws between Computational Resources and Reasoning Quality

2025-08-16 · Ziqian Bi, Lu Chen, Junhao Song, Hongying Luo 외 arxiv

This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of thinking budget mechanisms in medical reasoning tasks, revealing fundamental scaling laws between computational resources and reasoning quality. We systematically…

Switch-Reasoner: Learn When to Think in Multitask Mixtures via Reinforcement Learning

2026-07-09 · Yiyang Fang, Pei Fu, Jinjie Li, Jian Liang 외 arxiv

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often follow a fixed Think-then-Answer paradigm, which is inefficient in heterogeneous multitask settings because simple inputs may not require explicit reasoning while difficult …

Reinforcement Learning

Do Thinking Tokens Help with Safety?

2026-06-23 · Narutatsu Ri, Abhishek Panigrahi, Sanjeev Arora arxiv

Today's reasoning models use thinking tokens to attain stronger performance on benchmarks than their instruction-tuned counterparts. It is also generally believed that this more "deliberative" mode should improve alignme…