EigentSearch-Q+: Enhancing Deep Research Agents with Structured Reasoning Tools
Deep research requires reasoning over web evidence to answer open-ended questions, and it is a core capability for AI agents. Yet many deep research agents still rely on implicit, unstructured search behavior that causes redundant exploration and brittle evidence aggregation. Motivated by Anthropic's "think" tool paradigm and insights from the information-retrieval literature, we introduce Q+, a set of query and evidence processing tools that make web search more deliberate by guiding query planning, monitoring search progress, and extracting evidence from long web snapshots. We integrate Q+ into the browser sub-agent of Eigent, an open-source, production-ready multi-agent workforce for computer use, yielding EigentSearch-Q+. Across four benchmarks (SimpleQA-Verified, FRAMES, WebWalkerQA, and XBench DeepSearch), Q+ improves Eigent's browser agent benchmark-size-weighted average accuracy by 3.0, 3.8, and 0.6 percentage points (pp) for GPT-4.1, GPT-5.1, and Minimax M2.5 model backends, respectively. Case studies further suggest that EigentSearch-Q+ produces more coherent tool-calling trajectories by making search progress and evidence handling explicit.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Agentic Reasoning: Reasoning LLMs with Tools for the Deep Research
We introduce Agentic Reasoning, a framework that enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by integrating external tool-using agents. Unlike conventional LLM-based reasoning approaches, which rely solely on internal …
Decision MakingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Model+3Review of Case-Based Reasoning for LLM Agents: Theoretical Foundations, Architectural Components, and Cognitive Integration
Agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities in various tasks. Still, they face limitations in tasks requiring specific, structured knowledge, flexibility, or accounta…
RetrievalRetrieval-augmented GenerationCo-Sight: Enhancing LLM-Based Agents via Conflict-Aware Meta-Verification and Trustworthy Reasoning with Structured Facts
Long-horizon reasoning in LLM-based agents often fails not from generative weakness but from insufficient verification of intermediate reasoning. Co-Sight addresses this challenge by turning reasoning into a falsifiable …
A Survey of LLM-based Agents in Medicine: How far are we from Baymax?
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming healthcare through the development of LLM-based agents that can understand, reason about, and assist with medical tasks. This survey provides a comprehensive review of LLM-ba…
HallucinationSurveyLogic Agent: Enhancing Validity with Logic Rule Invocation
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has emerged as a pivotal technique for augmenting the inferential capabilities of language models during reasoning tasks. Despite its advancements, CoT often grapples with challenges in v…
InformativenessNavigate