paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

End-to-End Annotator Bias Approximation on Crowdsourced Single-Label Sentiment Analysis

2021-11-03 · ICNLSP 2021 11 · Gerhard Johann Hagerer, David Szabo, Andreas Koch, Maria Luisa Ripoll Dominguez, Christian Widmer, Maximilian Wich, Hannah Danner, Georg Groh

Sentiment analysis is often a crowdsourcing task prone to subjective labels given by many annotators. It is not yet fully understood how the annotation bias of each annotator can be modeled correctly with state-of-the-art methods. However, resolving annotator bias precisely and reliably is the key to understand annotators' labeling behavior and to successfully resolve corresponding individual misconceptions and wrongdoings regarding the annotation task. Our contribution is an explanation and improvement for precise neural end-to-end bias modeling and ground truth estimation, which reduces an undesired mismatch in that regard of the existing state-of-the-art. Classification experiments show that it has potential to improve accuracy in cases where each sample is annotated only by one single annotator. We provide the whole source code publicly and release an own domain-specific sentiment dataset containing 10,000 sentences discussing organic food products. These are crawled from social media and are singly labeled by 10 non-expert annotators.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2111.02326

Code (1)

theonlyandreas/end-to-end-crowdsourcing 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

MisconceptionsSentiment Analysis

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Tasks

2023-11-16 · Negar Mokhberian, Myrl G. Marmarelis, Frederic R. Hopp, Valerio Basile 외

Supervised classification heavily depends on datasets annotated by humans. However, in subjective tasks such as toxicity classification, these annotations often exhibit low agreement among raters. Annotations have common…

ClassificationFairness

Ranking annotators for crowdsourced labeling tasks

2011-12-01 · NeurIPS 2011 12 · Vikas C. Raykar, Shipeng Yu

With the advent of crowdsourcing services it has become quite cheap and reasonably effective to get a dataset labeled by multiple annotators in a short amount of time. Various methods have been proposed to estimate the c…

Correcting Annotator Bias in Training Data: Population-Aligned Instance Replication (PAIR)

2025-01-12 · Stephanie Eckman, Bolei Ma, Christoph Kern, Rob Chew 외

Models trained on crowdsourced labels may not reflect broader population views, because those who work as annotators do not represent the population. We propose Population-Aligned Instance Replication (PAIR), a method to…

False Discovery Rate Control and Statistical Quality Assessment of Annotators in Crowdsourced Ranking

2016-05-19 · Qianqian Xu, Jiechao Xiong, Xiaochun Cao, Yuan YAO

With the rapid growth of crowdsourcing platforms it has become easy and relatively inexpensive to collect a dataset labeled by multiple annotators in a short time. However due to the lack of control over the quality of t…

PositionSociology

Reducing annotator bias by belief elicitation

2024-10-21 · Terne Sasha Thorn Jakobsen, Andreas Bjerre-Nielsen, Robert Böhm

Crowdsourced annotations of data play a substantial role in the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It is broadly recognised that annotations of text data can contain annotator bias, where systematic disagreemen…