paper-with-me

Papers

Evaluating Automated Driving Planner Robustness against Adversarial Influence

2022-05-29 · Andres Molina-Markham, Silvia G. Ionescu, Erin Lanus, Derek Ng, Sam Sommerer, Joseph J. Rushanan

Evaluating the robustness of automated driving planners is a critical and challenging task. Although methodologies to evaluate vehicles are well established, they do not yet account for a reality in which vehicles with autonomous components share the road with adversarial agents. Our approach, based on probabilistic trust models, aims to help researchers assess the robustness of protections for machine learning-enabled planners against adversarial influence. In contrast with established practices that evaluate safety using the same evaluation dataset for all vehicles, we argue that adversarial evaluation fundamentally requires a process that seeks to defeat a specific protection. Hence, we propose that evaluations be based on estimating the difficulty for an adversary to determine conditions that effectively induce unsafe behavior. This type of inference requires precise statements about threats, protections, and aspects of planning decisions to be guarded. We demonstrate our approach by evaluating protections for planners relying on camera-based object detectors.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2205.14697

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Automated Driving with Evolution Capability: A Reinforcement Learning Method with Monotonic Performance Enhancement

2024-12-14 · Jia Hu, Xuerun Yan, Tian Xu, Haoran Wang

Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers a promising solution to enable evolutionary automated driving. However, the conventional RL method is always concerned with risk performance. The updated policy may not obtain a perform…

Decision Makingreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)

Test Automation for Interactive Scenarios via Promptable Traffic Simulation

2025-06-01 · Augusto Mondelli, Yueshan Li, Alessandro Zanardi, Emilio Frazzoli

Autonomous vehicle (AV) planners must undergo rigorous evaluation before widespread deployment on public roads, particularly to assess their robustness against the uncertainty of human behaviors. While recent advancement…

Bayesian Optimization

TreeIRL: Safe Urban Driving with Tree Search and Inverse Reinforcement Learning

2025-09-16 · Momchil S. Tomov, Sang Uk Lee, Hansford Hendrago, Jinwook Huh 외 arxiv

We present TreeIRL, a novel planner for autonomous driving that combines Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) and inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to achieve state-of-the-art performance in simulation and in real-world dri…

Reinforcement LearningAutonomous Driving

LanEvil: Benchmarking the Robustness of Lane Detection to Environmental Illusions

2024-06-03 · Tianyuan Zhang, Lu Wang, Hainan Li, Yisong Xiao 외

Lane detection (LD) is an essential component of autonomous driving systems, providing fundamental functionalities like adaptive cruise control and automated lane centering. Existing LD benchmarks primarily focus on eval…

Autonomous DrivingBenchmarkingLane Detection

Driving with Style: Inverse Reinforcement Learning in General-Purpose Planning for Automated Driving

2019-05-01 · Sascha Rosbach, Vinit James, Simon Großjohann, Silviu Homoceanu 외

Behavior and motion planning play an important role in automated driving. Traditionally, behavior planners instruct local motion planners with predefined behaviors. Due to the high scene complexity in urban environments,…

Motion Planningreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)